Comparison of the efficacy and safety of sedative and analgesic anesthesia in patients undergoing surgery in supine versus prone position
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-4598.2017.s1.023
- VernacularTitle:镇静镇痛麻醉用于俯卧位整形外科手术的可行性和安全性
- Author:
Weipeng XIA
1
;
Lingxin WEI
;
Xiaoming DENG
;
Jinghu SUI
;
Yulei SUN
;
Juhui LIU
;
Wenli XU
Author Information
1. 中国医学科学院整形外科医院麻醉科
- Keywords:
Monitored anesthesia care;
Dexmedetomidine;
Remifentanil;
Supine position;
Prone position
- From:
Chinese Journal of Plastic Surgery
2017;33(z1):110-114
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of sedative and analgesic anesthesia in surgical patients with supine and prone position .Methods Sixty female patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ, aged from 18 -53 years, scheduled for elective plastic operations under sedative and analgesic anesthesia combined with local anesthesia were divided into two groups according to their surgical positions: supine group ( n=30 ) and prone group ( n=30 ) .All patients received Ⅳ dexmedetomidine ( DEX) 1 μg/kg over 15 min followed by 0.4 -0.7 μg/kg/h infusion. Both groups were administered Ⅳ midazolam 0.04 mg/kg and a continuous infusion of remifentanil of 0.1 μg/kg/min at the beginning of anesthesia .Heart rate ( HR) , mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulse oximetry (SpO2), respiratory rate (RR), bispectral index (BIS) and Ramsay sedation scores ( RSS) were recorded at the following time points: before anesthesia ( T0 ) , 5 min after induction with midazolam ( T1 ) , 10 min after induction of midazolam ( T2 ) , immediately after induction with DEX( T3 ) , the beginning of local anesthesia ( T4 ) , the beginning of surgery ( T5 ) , 30 min after anesthesia induction ( T6 ) , 60 min after anesthesia induction ( T7 ) , immediately after turning off DEX infusion (T8), the end of surgery (T9).Incidences of respiratory depression, incidences of apnea, oxygen supplementation by facial mask and jaw-thrust, frequencies of body movements and additional rescue medication were also recorded .After surgery , recall of events during surgery , the visual analogue scales (VAS) for pain in PACU, the satisfaction levels of patients and surgeons were also assessed .Results No significant differences were found in MAP , SpO2 , RR, BIS, RSS scores at any time point between two groups (all P >0.05).There were no significant differences in incidences of respiratory depression , frequencies of body movements and additional rescue medication during surgery between groups ( all P>0. 05).Neither were recall of events during surgery , the visual analogue scales (VAS) for pain and the satisfaction levels of patients and surgeons after surgery (all P>0.05).The HR at time points of T0, T1, T2 in prone group were significantly higher than those in supine group (all P<0.05).Compared with the supine group , the incidences of apnea , oxygen supplementation by facial mask and jaw-thrust in prone group were significantly lower .Conclusions Sedative and analgesic anesthesia is effective and safe for patients with prone surgical position and has a lower incidence of upper airway obstruction during surgery than patients in supine surgical position .
