The relationship between HPV integration and prognosis of cervical cancer
10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20191031-00705
- VernacularTitle:人乳头瘤病毒整合与宫颈癌预后的关系
- Author:
Zheng MIAO
1
;
Jie SHEN
;
Fuquan ZHANG
;
Ke HU
;
Xiaorong HOU
;
Xin LIAN
;
Shuai SUN
;
Junfang YAN
;
Zhikai LIU
Author Information
1. 中国医学科学院北京协和医学院北京协和医院放疗科 100730
- Keywords:
Cervical neoplasms;
Human papilloma virus integration;
Common fragile sites;
Prognosis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Oncology
2020;42(12):1014-1019
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the relationship between human papillomavirus (HPV) integration and prognosis of cervical cancer patients.Methods:The data of 82 patients with cervical cancer treated in the Radiotherapy Department of Peking Union Medical College Hospital from October 2004 to June 2012 were retrospectively analyzed.The patients were divided into poor prognosis group (recurrence or metastasis after surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy) and good prognosis group based on a propensity score matching strategy.The HPV integration of the two groups were detected by whole exome sequencing to determine whether the integration sites were located in the common fragile sites (CFSs). HPV integration and integration into CFSs were compared between the two groups.Results:Among the enrolled 82 patients, 37 were divided in poor survival group and 45 in good survival group. A total of 90 integration breakpoints were identified, 30 of them occurred in poor prognosis group and 60 occurred in good prognosis group. In the poor prognosis group, HPV integration occurred in 20 patients, 13 of them were inserted in CFSs of 11 patients, and the numbers in good prognosis group were 26, 17, 11, respectively. There were no significantly statistical differences in the number of HPV integration events ( P=0.289), HPV integration patients ( P=0.735), CFSs integration events ( P=0.427), and CFSs integration patients ( P=0.591) between the two groups. In poor prognosis group, more CFSs integration events occurred in patients with metastasis than those in patients with only local recurrence (9 vs 2, P=0.003). Conclusions:No significant differences are observed in HPV integration and HPV integration into CFSs between cervical cancer patients with different prognoses. HPV integration into CFSs may be associated with distant metastasis.
