Comparison of efficacy of single-tunnel single-bundle and double-bundle reconstruction in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
10.7619/jcmp.201715027
- VernacularTitle:单骨道单、双束前交叉韧带重建治疗前交叉韧带断裂患者的疗效比较
- Author:
Xichun HU
1
;
Changming HUANG
;
Huaqiang FAN
;
Shaozhan ZHANG
;
Jianxiong WANG
;
Yangpan FU
;
Haiyan LU
;
Huixiang DONG
Author Information
1. 解放军第一七四医院(厦门大学附属成功医院)
- Keywords:
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction;
knee joint;
arthroscopy
- From:
Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
2017;21(15):98-100
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the efficacy of single-tunnel single-bundle and double-bundle reconstruction in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Methods A total of 64 patients with anterior cruciate ligament rupture in our hospital were randomly divided into single-bundle group with 32 cases and double-bundle group with 32 cases, given single-tunnel single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and single-tunnel double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.The IKDC, Tegner, Lysholm and KT-2000 scores were compared in two groups preoperation and at 12 months after operation.Results Thee were no significant difference in sex, age, injured site and injured time in the two groups(P>0.05).The IKDC, Tegner and Lysholm scores after operation were higher than operation before, and the KT-2000 scores was lower than operation before in two groups, and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).But there were no significant differences in IKDC, Tegner, Lysholm and KT-2000 scores between two groups before and after treatment(P>0.05).Conclusion The subjective and objective function scores of two groups showed no significant difference.But single-tunnel double-bundle for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is characterized by simplicity, firmly fixation and effectively restoration of knee stability.