Dosimetric analysis of different optimization algorithms for three-dimensional brachytherapy for gynecologic tumors
10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2024.04.20
- VernacularTitle:妇科肿瘤近距离三维后装放疗不同优化方法的剂量学分析比较
- Author:
Baozhen LING
1
,
2
;
Li CHEN
;
Jun ZHANG
;
Xinping CAO
;
Weijun YE
;
Yi OUYANG
;
Feng CHI
;
Zhenhua DING
Author Information
1. 南方医科大学公共卫生学院放射医学系,广东 广州 510515
2. 中山大学肿瘤防治中心//华南恶性肿瘤防治全国重点实验室//肿瘤医学协同创新中心,广东 广州 510060
- Keywords:
gynecologic tumors;
brachytherapy;
inverse optimization;
IPSA;
HIPO
- From:
Journal of Southern Medical University
2024;44(4):773-779
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the dosimetric difference between manual and inverse optimization in 3-dimensional (3D) brachytherapy for gynecologic tumors. Methods This retrospective study was conducted among a total of 110 patients with gynecologic tumors undergoing intracavitary combined with interstitial brachytherapy or interstitial brachytherapy. Based on the original images, the brachytherapy plans were optimized for each patient using Gro, IPSA1, IPSA2 (with increased volumetric dose limits on the basis of IPSA1) and HIPO algorithms. The dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters of the clinical target volume (CTV) including V200, V150, V100, D90, D98 and CI, and the dosimetric parameters D2cc, D1cc, and D0.1cc for the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid colon were compared among the 4 plans. Results Among the 4 plans, Gro optimization took the longest time, followed by HIPO, IPSA2 and IPSA1 optimization. The mean D90, D98, and V100 of HIPO plans were significantly higher than those of Gro and IPSA plans, and D90 and V100 of IPSA1, IPSA2 and HIPO plans were higher than those of Gro plans (P<0.05), but the CI of the 4 plans were similar (P>0.05). For the organs at risk (OARs), the HIPO plan had the lowest D2cc of the bladder and rectum;the bladder absorbed dose of Gro plans were significantly greater than those of IPSA1 and HIPO (P<0.05). The D2cc and D1cc of the rectum in IPSA1, IPSA2 and HIPO plans were better than Gro (P<0.05). The D2cc and D1cc of the sigmoid colon did not differ significantly among the 4 plans. Conclusion Among the 4 algorithms, the HIPO algorithm can better improve dose coverage of the target and lower the radiation dose of the OARs, and is thus recommended for the initial plan optimization. Clinically, the combination of manual optimization can achieve more individualized dose distribution of the plan.
