Feasibility and safety study of distal radial artery approach in emergency PCI of elderly STEMI patients
10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20230831-00119
- VernacularTitle:远端桡动脉入径在老年STEMI患者急诊PCI中的可行性及安全性研究
- Author:
Hui WANG
1
;
Ning YANG
;
Yingwu LIU
;
Yuming LI
Author Information
1. 天津医科大学心血管病临床学院，天津 300457
- Keywords:
Myocardial infarction;
Distal radial artery;
Percutaneous coronary intervention treatment;
Radial artery occlusion
- From:
Chinese Journal of Cardiology
2024;52(3):276-280
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the feasibility and safety of distal radial artery approach in emergency percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) of elderly ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI) patients.Methods:This study is a cross-sectional study. Elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction who received emergency PCI at the Third Central Hospital of Tianjin from January 2020 to December 2022 were selected. They were divided into the distal radial artery group and the classic radial artery group based on the puncture location. The success rate, puncture time, surgical success rate, and surgical time of the two groups were observed; The incidence of complications in patients, including radial artery occlusion rate, radial artery spasm rate, local hematoma rate, aneurysm incidence rate were recorded.Results:There were 70 cases in the distal radial artery group, including 33 males (47.1%), aged (65.6±6.7) years old; There were 70 cases in the classic radial artery group, including 35 males (50.0%), aged (66.4±6.9) years old. There was no statistically significant difference in puncture success rate, puncture time, surgical success rate, and surgical time between the distal radial artery group and the classical radial artery group ( P>0.05). The incidence of radial artery occlusion in the distal radial artery group was significantly lower than that in the classical radial artery group (1.4% vs. 8.6%, P=0.024). The postoperative compression time in the distal radial artery group was significantly shorter than that in the classical radial artery group ((291.6±10.5) min vs. (343.5±9.8) min, P=0.047). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of radial artery spasm, local hematoma, and aneurysm between the two groups ( P>0.05). Conclusions:The distal radial artery approach has a lower radial artery occlusion rate, shorter compression time, and better safety. It can be used as a new approach for emergency PCI in elderly patients with STEMI for clinical application.
