A multicenter, retrospective epidemiologic survey of the clinical features and management of bone metastatic disease in China
10.1186/s40880-016-0102-6
- Author:
Yang YUNPENG
1
;
Ma YUXIANG
;
Sheng JIN
;
Huang YAN
;
Zhao YUANYUAN
;
Fang WENFENG
;
Hong SHAODONG
;
Tian YING
;
Xue CONG
;
Zhang LI
Author Information
1. Department of Medical 0ncology
- Keywords:
Bisphosphonates;
Bone metastases;
Skeleton-related events;
Chinese cancer patients
- From:Chinese Journal of Cancer
2016;35(5):19-24
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Background: Bone metastases are common in patients with advanced cancer. Bisphosphonates (BPs) could prevent or delay the development of skeleton-related events (SREs). The present study aimed to identify the clinical features of and treatment strategies for Chinese patients with bone metastases. Methods: Consecutive cancer patients who had bone metastases and received BP treatment were enrolled. A ques-tionnaire was developed to collect the patients’clinical data, as well as information on the diagnosis and manage-ment of bone metastases. Physicians’awareness of the guidelines and knowledge of the application of BP were also assessed. Results: A total of 3223 patients with lung cancer (36.5%), breast cancer (30.9%), prostate cancer (8.5%), and gas-trointestinal cancer (5.7%) were included in this study. The sites of bone metastases were the thoracic spine (56.0 %), lumbar spine (47.1%), ribs (32.6%), and pelvis (23.2%). The SRE frequency was the highest in patients with multiple myeloma (36.6%), followed by those with lung cancer (25.9%), breast cancer (20.2%), prostate cancer (18.2%), and gas-trointestinal cancer (17.3%). Irradiation to the bone was the most frequent SRE (58% in lung cancer patients, 45% in breast cancer patients, and 48% in prostate cancer patients). Our survey also showed that 45.5% of patients received BP within 3 months after their diagnosis of bone metastases, whereas the remaining 54.5% of patients did not receive BP treatment until at least 3 months after their diagnosis of bone metastases. The SRE frequency in the former group was significantly lower than that in the latter group (4.0% vs. 42.3%, P < 0.05). In patients with more than 6 months of continuous BP treatment, the mean time to the first SRE was significantly longer than that in patients with less than 6 months of continuous BP treatment (7.2 vs. 3.4 months, P < 0.05). In addition, 12.2% of the physicians were not aware of the efcacy of BP in preventing and delaying SRE. Only half (52.3%) of the physicians agreed that the BP treatment should persist for at least 6 months unless it was intolerable. Conclusions: Our study suggested that prompt and persistent BP treatment was associated with a reduced risk of SREs. However, our survey also revealed that the proper application of BP was not as common as expected in China.
