Characteristics of drug resistance in HIV/AIDS patients with antiretroviral treatment failure in Henan Province
10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20230505-00279
- VernacularTitle:河南省抗病毒治疗失败的艾滋病患者耐药特征
- Author:
Xuan YANG
1
;
Yan SUN
;
Yuqi HUO
;
Jinjin LIU
;
Xiaohua ZHANG
;
Shuxian ZHAO
;
Qingxia ZHAO
;
Xue ZHANG
;
Yan WANG
;
Zhaoyun CHEN
Author Information
1. 郑州市第六人民医院，郑州 450015
- Keywords:
HIV;
Antiretroviral treatment failure;
Genotypic drug resistance;
Characteristics of drug resistance
- From:
Chinese Journal of Epidemiology
2023;44(11):1795-1801
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To analyze the drug resistance characteristics of HIV/AIDS patients in Henan Province with antiretroviral treatment (ART) failure through the genotypic drug resistance detection.Methods:Blood samples were collected from HIV/AIDS patients who received ART for more than 6 months with viral loads ≥1 000 copies/ml in 18 cities of Henan from January 2018 to May 2021. The genotypic drug resistance detection was conducted by using an In-house drug resistance detection method. The drug resistance mutation (DRM) and antiretroviral susceptibility were analyzed by submitting the determined sequences to the Stanford HIV-1 drug resistance database. The information about patients' demographic characteristics and antiviral treatment data were collected.Results:A total of 887 HIV/AIDS patients with ART failure, 812 sequences were successfully amplified with the success rate of 91.54%. In the 812 patients, 676 were drug resistant (83.25%, 676/812). The drug resistance ratesto nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), protease inhibitors (PIs), and integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) were 73.40% (596/812), 80.54% (654/812), 5.54% (45/812), and 2.56% (17/663), respectively. There were significant differences in drug resistance rates among four types of drugs ( χ2=1 686.34, P<0.001). The drug resistance rate to two drugs was 66.38% (539/812), and the drug resistance rate to three drugs was 5.79% (47/812). A total of 9 subtypes of HIV-1were detected, in which subtype B accounted for 59.61%(484/812), followed by subtype CRF01_AE (22.17%, 180/812) and subtype CRF07_BC (9.48%, 77/812). There were significant differences in drug resistance rate among different subtypes ( χ2=21.33, P=0.001). Among NRTIs related mutation sites, the DRM rate of M184V/I was highest (63.42%, 515/812), followed by K65R (27.46%, 223/812). The top three DRM rates were detected for K103N/S (34.98%, 284/812), G190A/S (26.11%, 212/812) and V106M/I (24.63%, 200/812) among NNRTIs related mutation sites, and M46I (4.31%, 35/812), V82A/F (3.82%, 31/812), and I54V/MV (3.69%, 30/812) among PIs related mutation sites. While among INSTIs related mutation sites, E157Q/EQ had the highest DRM rate (3.47%, 23/663), followed by R263K (0.75%, 5/663) and G140A (0.75%, 5/663). The resistance to lamivudine and emtricitabine of NRTIs was at high-level (65.52%, 532/812), and the resistance to nevirapine (77.46%, 629/812) and efavirenz (71.18%, 578/812) of NNRTIs was also at high-level. The medium/high-level resistance to lopinavir/ritonavir of PIs was only 4.19% (34/812), the medium/high-level resistance to elvitegravir and raltegravir of INSTIs was 1.66% (11/663) and 1.21% (8/663), respectively, and no high-level resistance to bictegravir or dolutegravir was found. Conclusions:The drug resistance in HIV/AIDS patients with ART failure was high in Henan, characterized by high drug resistance rates to NRTIs and NNRTIs, and diverse and complex resistance mutations. So high resistance barrier ART-regimens were recommended, and the viral load monitoring and drug resistance testing after ART should be strengthened.
