The Imaging Features of Desmoid Tumors: the Usefulness of Diffusion Weighted Imaging to Differentiate between Desmoid and Malignant Soft Tissue Tumors.
10.13104/imri.2017.21.3.162
- Author:
Seung Baek LEE
1
;
Soon Nam OH
;
Moon Hyung CHOI
;
Sung Eun RHA
;
Seung Eun JUNG
;
Jae Young BYUN
Author Information
1. Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. hiohsn@gmail.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
CT;
MRI;
Desmoid Tumor;
Fibromatosis;
DWI
- MeSH:
Abdominal Wall;
Diffusion*;
Electrons;
Fibroma;
Fibromatosis, Aggressive*;
Hemorrhage;
Humans;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- From:Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging
2017;21(3):162-170
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To evaluate the imaging findings of desmoid tumors using various imaging modalities and to evaluate whether diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) can help differentiate between desmoid and malignant tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 27 patients with pathologically confirmed desmoid tumors. Two radiologists reviewed 23 computed tomography (CT), 12 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 8 positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scans of desmoid tumors and recorded data regarding the shape, multiplicity, size, location, degree of enhancement, and presence or absence of calcification or hemorrhage. The signal intensity of masses on T1- and T2-weighted imaging and the presence or absence of whirling or band-like low signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging were recorded. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the desmoid tumors in nine patients with DWIs were compared with the ADC values of 32 malignant tumors. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) on PET-CT images was measured in 8 patients who underwent a PET-CT. RESULTS: The mean size of the 27 tumors was 6.77 cm (range, 2.5-26 cm) and four tumors exhibited multiplicity. The desmoid tumors were classified by shape as either mass forming (n = 18), infiltrative (n = 4), or combined (n = 5). The location of the tumors was either intra-abdominal (n = 15), within the abdominal wall (n = 8) or extra-abdominal (n = 4). Among the 27 tumors, 21 showed moderate to marked enhancement and 22 showed homogeneous enhancement. Two tumors showed calcifications and one displayed hemorrhage. Eleven of the 12 MR T2-weighted images showed whirling or band-like low signal intensity areas in the mass. The mean ADC value of the desmoid tumors (1493 × 10⁻⁶ mm²/s) was significantly higher than the mean of the malignant soft tissue tumors (873 × 10⁻⁶ mm²/s, P < 0.001). On the PET-CT images, all tumors exhibited an intermediate SUV(max) (mean, 3.7; range, 2.3–4.5). CONCLUSION: Desmoids tumors showed homogenous, moderate to marked enhancement on CT and MRI scans and a characteristic whirling or band-like pattern on T2-weighted images. DWI can be useful for the differentiation of desmoid tumors from malignant soft tissue tumors.
