Effect of voice therapy via telepractice on voice symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease
10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20230914-00091
- VernacularTitle:远程嗓音训练对咽喉反流性疾病嗓音症状的疗效研究
- Author:
Yue HAN
1
;
Sen ZHANG
;
Pengfei HE
;
Chenyang LIU
;
Run LIU
;
Lina JIA
;
Hui HUANGFU
Author Information
1. 山西医科大学第一医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科，太原 030000
- Keywords:
Laryngopharyngeal reflux;
Voice;
Therapy;
Telepractice
- From:
Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
2023;58(11):1123-1127
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of voice therapy via telepractice on voice function in laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) patients.Methods:The prospective study included 120 patients from January 2021 to July 2022 with dyspnea and LPRD diagnosed at the department of otolaryngology head and neck surgery of the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University. These patients were then randomly divided into standard treatment group (group A), combined face-to-face voice therapy group (group B) and combined telepractice voice therapy group (group C). We collected and compared data on curative effect in patients with LPRD at the 8th week(Stage 1) and the 12th week of treatment(Stage 2) and the 6th week post-treatment(Stage 3). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 22.0.Results:One hundred and twenty patients with LPRD and dyspnea were included in the study (63 men, 57 women, 18-65 years old). At stage 1, there were statistically significant differences among the three groups in Voice Handicap Index(VHI), Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Reflux Finding Score(RFS) ( F=13.72, P<0.05; F=62.50, P<0.05; F=3.78, P<0.05). VHI and RSI in group B and C were significantly smaller than those in group A, VHI and RSI in group C were significantly smaller than those in group B, and RFS in group C was significantly smaller than that in group A and B. At stage 2, there were statistically significant differences between the three groups in Maximum Phonation Time(MPT), Dysphonia Severity Index(DSI), VHI, RSI and RFS( F=8.49, P<0.05; F=3.24, P<0.05; F=8.55, P<0.05; F=19.92, P<0.05; F=12.19, P<0.05). MPT and DSI in group B and C were significantly larger than those in group A. The scores of VHI, RSI and RFS in group B and C were significantly smaller than those in group A, and RFS in group C was significantly smaller than that in group B. At stage 3, there were statistically significant differences among the three groups in Jitter, MPT, DSI, VHI( F=3.19, P<0.05; F=19.37, P<0.05; F=43.56, P<0.05; F=11.05, P<0.05), and there were statistically significant differences among the three groups in RSI and RFS( F=25.58, P<0.05; F=11.82, P<0.05). MPT and DSI in group B and C were significantly larger than those in group A. The scores of VHI and RSI in group B and C were significantly smaller than those in group A, and RFS in group C was significantly smaller than those in group A and B. Conclusion:Telepractice can be used in patients with LPRD and dyspnea as an alternative to face-to-face voice therapy with better long-term outcomes.
