Clinical application of retrosigmoid approach for BONEBRIDGE implantation after auricle reconstruction using expanded postauricular flap
10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20230308-00102
- VernacularTitle:乙状窦后骨桥植入在耳后皮肤扩张法耳廓再造术后患者中的临床应用
- Author:
Danni WANG
1
;
Bingqing WANG
;
Ran REN
;
Peiwei CHEN
;
Yujie LIU
;
Qingguo ZHANG
;
Shouqin ZHAO
Author Information
1. 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科 北京市耳鼻咽喉科研究所 教育部耳鼻咽喉头颈科学重点实验室（首都医科大学），北京 100730
- Keywords:
Congenital aural atresia;
Hearing implantation;
Bone conduction hearing aid;
Surgery, plastic
- From:
Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
2023;58(10):980-985
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the safety and reliability of retrosigmoid approach BONEBRIDGE implantation in patients with auricle reconstruction using skin expansion flap.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on 43 congenital aural atresia cases (43 ears) who underwent BONEBRIDGE implantation from September 2019 to January 2023 in Beijing Tongren Hospital. 30 males and 13 females were included in this work. The implantation age was 9-36 years old (median age=10 y/o). All cases underwent auricle reconstruction surgery using the posterior ear flap expansion method, with 36 cases using the single expanded postauricular flap method and 7 cases using two-flap method. BONEBRIDGE implant surgery was performed during the third stage of auricle reconstruction or after all stages. The hearing improvements were evaluated by comparing the changes in pure tone hearing threshold and speech recognition rate of patients before and after BONEBRIDGE implantation. Routine follow-up was conducted to observe the hearing results and complications. SPSS 14.0 software was applied for data statistical analysis.Results:All 43 patients healed well and had no surgical complications when discharge. The average bone conduction hearing threshold after surgery was (8.2±6.6) dBHL, and there was no statistically significant difference compared to the preoperative [(8.1±5.7) dBHL] ( P=0.95). After surgery, the threshold of hearing assistance with power on was significantly lower than that without hearing assistance [(32.8±4.6) dBHL vs (60.5±5.5) dBHL], and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.001). The speech recognition rate of monosyllable words, disyllabic words and short sentences in quiet environment increased to 72%, 84%, and 98% respectively. The differences were statistically significant ( P<0.001). The speech recognition rate of monosyllabic words, disyllabic words, and short sentences in noise environment was significantly increased by 70%, 80%, and 92% respectively ( P<0.001). After a follow-up of 4 to 47 months (median=24 months), the hearing results were stable and the aesthetic outcomes were satisfying. One patient had delayed hematoma around coil of the implant. After aspiration and compressed dressing for one week, hematoma was not recurrent. Conclusion:For patients after auricle reconstruction using expanded postauricular flap, the preference of retrosigmoid approach is a good choice in terms of safety and reliability of operation, as well as aesthetic appearance.
