Evaluation and analysis of anxiety, depression and quality of life in vasomotor rhinitis
10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20191230-00787
- VernacularTitle:血管运动性鼻炎焦虑抑郁状态和生活质量的评估与分析
- Author:
Tian ZHANG
1
;
Guodong YU
;
Ping GU
;
Qiang TANG
;
Ying JIN
;
Xingchen HE
Author Information
1. 贵州医科大学附属医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科，贵阳 550002
- Keywords:
Vasomotor rhinitis;
Anxiety;
Depression;
Quality of life
- From:
Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
2020;55(8):769-773
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the mental state and quality of life in patients with vasomotor rhinitis (VMR) before and after treatment, and to provide guidance for improving the overall health of VMR patients.Methods:Two hundred and twenty VMR patients (VMR group, 118 males, 102 females; aged from 18 to 72 years old), three hundred and twenty allergic rhinitis (AR) patients (AR group, 178 males, 142 females; aged from 18 to 79 years old) from January 2016 to September 2019 were selected in the otolaryngology clinic of Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, four hundred and twenty-three healthy people (control group, 243 males, 180 females; aged from 19 to 70 years old) were selected in physical examination center at the same time by continuous enrollment method, symptom check list (SCL-90), self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) were used to evaluate the mental state of VMR patients before and after treatment, and 12-item short form health survey version 2.0 (SF-12v2) was used to evaluate their quality of life, statistical data were collected and analyzed by ANOVA and t-test. Results:The scores of eight factors (physical function, role physical function, general health, vitality, role-emotional, mental health) of SF-12v2 in VMR patients before treatment were lower than that of posttreatment, that of AR patients and the control group, the differences were significant (all P<0.05), the scores of somatization, obsession, depression, anxiety and psychosis in SCL-90 in VMR patients before treatment were significantly higher than that of posttreatment, that of AR patients and the control group (all P<0.05), the SAS and SDS in VMR patients before treatment (51.28±16.32; 53.28±18.55) were significantly higher than that of posttreatment (38.53±13.21; 39.35±13.34), that of AR patients (42.23±14.32; 43.32±13.78) and the control group (29.78±10.07;33.46±10.55; tSAS were 9.007, 6.813 and 20.59; tSDS were 9.043, 7.154 and 17.260, all P<0.05). Conclusion:VMR patients generally suffer from psychological damage, which seriously affects the quality of life of the patients. On the basis of routine treatment, we should attach more importance to the negative psychology of VMR patients and intervene when necessary.
