Effect of gallic acid in increasing the chemosensitivity of hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells to sorafenib
- VernacularTitle:五倍子酸对肝癌HepG2细胞索拉非尼化疗增敏作用
- Author:
Baikun LIU
1
;
Zhiru WANG
1
;
Wenjing ZHAO
1
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords: Carcinoma， Hepatocellular; Sorafenib; Gallic Acid
- From: Journal of Clinical Hepatology 2025;41(2):292-299
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
- Abstract: ObjectiveTo investigate the chemosensitization effect of gallic acid （GA） combined with sorafenib （Sora） on hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells and related mechanisms. MethodsHepG2 cells were randomly divided into control group， GA group， Sora group， and GA+Sora group. CCK8 assay was used to measure cell viability； CompuSyn software was used to analyze combination index （CI）； colony formation assay was used to evaluate the colony formation ability of cells； flow cytometry was used to measure cell apoptosis； wound healing assay and Transwell chamber assay were used to observe the migration and invasion abilities of cells； Western Blot was used to measure the expression matrix metalloproteinase 2 （MMP-2）， matrix metalloproteinase 9 （MMP-9）， and apoptosis-related proteins. HepG2 cells were subcutaneously inoculated into the lower right back of mice， and 6 days later， the mice were divided into control group， GA group， Sora group， and GA+Sora group. Tumor size and body weight were measured once a week， and drug intervention was performed for 21 days. Then the nude mice were sacrificed， and tumor weight was measured. A one-way analysis of variance was used for comparison between multiple groups， and the least significant difference t-test was used for further comparison between two groups. ResultsThe mean IC50 values of GA and Sora for the treatment of HepG2 cells for 48 hours were 123.47±5.16 μmol/L and 9.87±0.98 μmol/L， respectively， and when Sora was combined with 70 μmol/L GA （IC30）， IC50 decreased to 2.06±0.35 μmol/L； the CI value was<1 for Sora at different concentrations combined with 70 μmol/L GA. The number of cell colonies was 234.0±20.4， 147.0±12.1， 129.3±13.3， and 73.0±7.6， respectively， in the four groups， and the GA+Sora group had a significantly lower number of cell colonies than the control group， the GA group， and the Sora group （all P<0.05）. After 48 hours of treatment， the cell apoptosis rate was 1.98%±0.29%， 15.17%± 1.56%， 18.65%±1.48%， and 34.60%±5.36%， respectively， in the four groups， and the GA+Sora group had a significantly higher cell apoptosis rate than the control group， the GA group， and the Sora group （all P<0.05）. After 24 hours of treatment， the cell migration rate was 55.59%±5.08%， 29.34%±4.36%， 21.80%±5.16%， and 6.47%±2.75%， respectively， in the four groups， and the GA+Sora group had a significantly lower cell migration rate than the control group， the GA group， and the Sora group （all P<0.05）. After 48 hours of treatment， the number of transmembrane cells was 223.7±13.0， 168.3±10.9， 155.3±29.1， and 62.7±19.7， respectively， in the four groups， and the GA+Sora group had a significantly lower number of transmembrane cells than the control group， the GA group， and the Sora group （all P<0.05）. Compared with the control group， the GA group， the Sora group， and the GA+Sora group had significant reductions in the protein expression levels of MMP-2， MMP-9， and Bcl-2 （all P<0.05） and significant increases in the protein expression levels of Bax and cleaved caspase-3 （all P<0.05）. Compared with the control group， the GA， Sora， and GA+Sora groups had significant reductions in tumor volume and weight （all P<0.05）， and compared with the Sora group， the GA+Sora group had significant reductions in tumor volume and weight in nude mice （both P<0.05）. ConclusionGA can increase the sensitivity of HepG2 cells to Sora chemotherapy， possibly by promoting cell apoptosis and inhibiting cell migration and invasion after combination with Sora.
