Clinical Application Value of Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Biofeedback Technology in Female Stress Urinary Incontinence
- VernacularTitle:磁刺激联合生物反馈技术在压力性尿失禁中的临床应用价值
- Author:
Yuxin HE
1
;
Shanshan YANG
;
Mei JIANG
;
Hua JIANG
Author Information
1. 南京医科大学附属妇产医院南京市妇幼保健院盆底康复中心,江苏南京 210000
- Keywords:
Magnetic stimulation;
Biofeedback;
Electrical stimulation;
Stress urinary incontinence
- From:
Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology
2024;40(9):762-765
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the clinical application value of magnetic stimulation combined with biofeed-back technology in female stress urinary incontinence(SUI).Methods:Sixty mild or moderate female SUI patients who underwent rehabilitation treatment at the Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation Center of Nanjing Women and Children's Healthcare Hospital from July to December 2021 were collected and randomly divided into two groups,with 30 pa-tients in each group.The observation group received a treatment protocol of electrical stimulation+biofeedback therapy(electric combined group)and the other group received a treatment protocol of magnetic stimulation+bi-ofeedback therapy(magnetic combined group).The treatment course for both groups consisted of 12 sessions.The Sandvik severity Index(urinary incontinence),the amount of u 1-hoururine leakage,pelvic floor muscle strength,pelvic floor muscle electrophysiological indices,the degree of urinary incontinence impact(ⅡQ-7 score)and the treatment efficacy were assessed and compared before and after the treatment in the two groups.Re-sults:Compared with the pre-treatment,the Sandvik Severity Index,the 1-hour urine leakage,and the n Q-7 score decreased in the magnetic combined group and the electric combined group after treatment,while the mus-cle strength of type Ⅰ,type Ⅱ,maximum of fast muscle,and mean value of slow muscle increased significantly,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The difference between the above indexes was not statistically significant when comparing the magnetic combined group and the electric combined group after treat-ment(P>0.05),and the treatment efficiency of the electric combined group was 93.33%and that of the magnet-ic combined group was 96.67%,and there was no statistical significance when comparing the efficiency of the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusions:Magnetic stimulation combined with biofeedback technology has high thera-peutic efficiency for mild or moderate SUl,and is an optional rehabilitation technique for women with SUI.