Literature Analysis of Radiotherapy in Uterine Cervix Cancer for the Processing of the Patterns of Care Study in Korea.
- Author:
Doo Ho CHOI
1
;
Eun Seog KIM
;
Yong Ho KIM
;
Jin Hee KIM
;
Dae Sik YANG
;
Seung Hee KANG
;
Hong Gyun WU
;
Il Han KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Seoul, Korea. dohochoi@hosp.sch.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Review
- Keywords:
Cervix cancer;
Radiotherapy;
PCS
- MeSH:
Barium;
Brachytherapy;
Cervix Uteri*;
Chemoradiotherapy;
Consensus;
Enema;
Female;
Humans;
Internet;
Japan;
Korea*;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging;
Radiotherapy*;
Biomarkers, Tumor;
United States;
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms;
Weights and Measures
- From:The Journal of the Korean Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
2005;23(2):61-70
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Uterine cervix cancer is one of the most prevalent women cancer in Korea. We analysed published papers in Korea with comparing Patterns of Care Study (PCS) articles of United States and Japan for the purpose of developing and processing Korean PCS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched PCS related foreign-produced papers in the PCS homepage (212 articles and abstracts) and from the Pub Med to find Structure and Process of the PCS. To compare their study with Korean papers, we used the internet site "Korean Pub Med" to search 99 articles regarding uterine cervix cancer and radiation therapy. We analysed Korean paper by comparing them with selected PCS papers regarding Structure, Process and Outcome and compared their items between the period of before 1980's and 1990's. RESULTS: Evaluable papers were 28 from United States, 10 from the Japan and 73 from the Korea which treated cervix PCS items. PCS papers for United States and Japan commonly stratified into 3~4 categories on the bases of the scales characteristics of the facilities, numbers of the patients, doctors. Researchers restricted eligible patients strictly. For the process of the study, they analysed factors regarding pretreatment staging in chronological order, treatment related factors, factors in addition to FIGO staging and treatment machine. Papers in United States dealt with racial characteristics, socioeconomic characteristics of the patients, tumor size (6), and bilaterality of parametrial or pelvic side wall invasion (5), whereas papers from Japan treated of the tumor markers. The common trend in the process of staging work-up was decreased use of lymphangiogram, barium enema and increased use of CT and MRI over the times. The recent subject from the Korean papers dealt with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (9 papers), treatment duration (4), tumor markers (8) and unconventional fractionation. CONCLUSION: By comparing papers among 3 nations, we collected items for Korean uterine cervix cancer PCS. By consensus meeting and close communication, survey items for cervix cancer PCS were developed to measure structure, process and outcome of the radiation treatment of the cervix cancer. Subsequent future research will focus on the use of brachytherapy and its impact on outcome including complications. These finding and future PCS studies will direct the development of educational programs aimed at correcting identified deficits in care.
