Concept, design and clinical application of minimally invasive liver transplantation through laparoscopic combined upper midline incision
10.12464/j.issn.1674-7445.2025023
- VernacularTitle:腹腔镜联合上腹正中切口微创肝移植的概念、设计和临床应用
- Author:
Shuhong YI
1
;
Hui TANG
1
;
Kaining ZENG
1
;
Xiao FENG
1
;
Binsheng FU
1
;
Qing YANG
1
;
Jia YAO
1
;
Yang YANG
1
;
Guihua CHEN
1
Author Information
1. Liver Transplantation Center, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China.
- Publication Type:OriginalArticle
- Keywords:
Liver transplantation;
Minimally invasive;
Laparoscopy;
Upper midline incision;
Hepatic artery embolization;
Hepatic artery thrombosis;
Anastomotic stricture;
Infection
- From:
Organ Transplantation
2025;16(1):67-73
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore the technical process and clinical application of laparoscopic combined upper midline incision minimally invasive liver transplantation. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 30 cases of laparoscopic combined upper midline incision minimally invasive liver transplantation. The cases were divided into cirrhosis group (15 cases) and liver failure group (15 cases) based on the primary disease. The surgical and postoperative conditions of the two groups were compared. Results All patients successfully underwent laparoscopic "clockwise" liver resection, with no cases of passive conversion to open surgery or intolerance to pneumoperitoneum. In 6 cases, the right lobe was relatively large, and the right hepatic ligaments could not be completely mobilized. One case required an additional reverse "L" incision during open surgery. All patients successfully completed the liver transplantation, with no major intraoperative bleeding, cardiovascular events, or other occurrences in the 30 patients. The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score in the cirrhosis group was lower than that in the liver failure group (P<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, surgical time, blood loss, anhepatic phase, or cold ischemia time (all P>0.05). During the perioperative period, there was 1 case of hepatic artery embolism, 1 case of portal vein anastomotic stenosis, no complications of hepatic vein and inferior vena cava, and 3 cases of biliary anastomotic stenosis, all of which occurred in the liver failure group. Conclusions In strictly selected cases, the minimally invasive liver transplantation technique combining laparoscopic hepatectomy with upper midline incision for graft implantation has the advantages of smaller incisions, less bleeding, relatively easier operation, and faster postoperative recovery, which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
