- Author:
Sharmaine H. Lozano
;
Agnes Espinoza-Thaebtharm
;
Melanie Joy Doria-Ruiz
- Publication Type:Meta-Analysis
- MeSH: Human; Carcinoma, Basal Cell; Lasers; Tumors; Neoplasms
- From: Journal of the Philippine Dermatological Society 2024;33(Suppl 1):37-37
- CountryPhilippines
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND
Surgical treatments are the first-line therapy for basal cell carcinoma (BCC). However, for patients who are not candidates for surgery, non-surgical options, such as pulsed dye laser (PDL), may be considered.
OBJECTIVEThis study aimed to review the existing literature on the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of PDL in the treatment of BCC.
METHODOLOGYA systematic review and meta-analysis of PDL for BCC were conducted. The primary outcomes assessed were clearance and recurrence rates. The secondary outcome was the incidence of adverse events.
RESULTSThe review included 11 studies (4 randomized controlled trials, 6 cohort studies, and 1 case series) comprising a total of 204 patients and 295 BCCs. Most BCCs were low-risk histologically and predominantly located on low-risk areas. The meta-analysis revealed an overall clearance rate of 69% and a recurrence rate of 32%, with follow-up periods ranging from 1 to 72 months. However, there was substantial and statistically significant heterogeneity across all studies. The most frequently reported adverse effects included pigmentary changes, primarily hypopigmentation, and varying degrees of scarring.
CONCLUSIONPDL is a safe and tolerable option for treating BCC, though it is not recommended as a sole treatment due to the higher clearance rates and lower recurrence rates associated with other modalities. PDL may be considered an alternative for non-surgical candidates with small or superficial BCCs. Further research is needed to establish standardized parameters for its use in BCC treatment.