Comparative analysis of health-related quality of life between children with bladder and bowel dysfunction versus lower urinary tract dysfunction and healthy controls
- Author:
Hirokazu IKEDA
1
;
Takahiro ONO
;
Chisato OYAKE
;
Yuta OONUKI
;
Yoshitaka WATANABE
;
Tsuneki WATANABE
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From: Investigative and Clinical Urology 2024;65(5):494-500
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Purpose:This study aimed to compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between children with bladder and bowel dysfunction (BBD) and lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) alone and healthy controls based on self-report forms and parent-proxy report forms.
Materials and Methods:In this retrospective study, clinical records were reviewed. Children with LUTD, with or without bowel dysfunction, and healthy children were included in this study. The dysfunctional voiding scoring system and Rome IV Diagnostic Criteria were used to assess lower urinary tract symptoms. The Rome IV Diagnostic Criteria was also used to evaluate bowel symptoms. The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 (PedsQL) questionnaire was administered to investigate pediatric HRQoL.
Results:Of the total 252 children (mean age, 7.3±2.1 years) who participated in this study, 78 were classified into the BBD group and 174 into the LUTD group. Compared with the control group, the BBD group had significantly lower total PedsQL scores (p<0.001) and psychosocial healthy summary scores (p<0.001). The BBD group had significantly lower emotional functioning scores than the LUTD group (p=0.023). Children with BBD who presented with fecal incontinence (FI) had a significantly lower social functioning score than those without FI (p=0.023).
Conclusions:Children with BBD who present with FI are at higher risk of decreased psychosocial HRQoL, and they require special emotional support. These findings underscore the need for effective treatment and follow-up to improve the HRQoL of children with BBD who presented with FI.
