The Clinical Efficacy of Topical Agents for Premature Ejaculation.
- Author:
Hyun Jun PARK
1
;
Chang Seok CHA
;
Nam Cheol PARK
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea. pnc@pusan.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Premature ejaculation;
Topical anesthetic agents;
Penis
- MeSH:
Adult;
Anesthesia, Local;
Anesthetics;
Coitus;
Ejaculation;
Foreign Bodies;
Genitalia;
Humans;
Hypersensitivity;
Male;
Odors;
Penis;
Premature Ejaculation*;
Viscosity
- From:Korean Journal of Andrology
2002;20(1):45-49
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The penile hypersensitivity is one of the complicated causes of premature ejaculation so that it has been applied to the local anesthesia or the penile dorsal neurectomy in the cases of treatment. The authors had compared the clinical efficacy of various kinds of OTC topical agents which were designed for premature ejaculation and were approved of selling in Korean market. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 10 normal adult male with ages from 29 to 24 years (ave. 33.4) were enrolled in this study. 8 topical agents of cream-type such as SS-cream(R), gel-type such as Power gel(R), B.M. gel(R), BIGTO gel(R) and Control gel(R), solution-type such as E.L.T soln(R), and spray type such as Sanova(R), Tstone(R) were applicated. With exception of SS-cream(R) which was natural medicine, the rest of them were made from lidocane 9.6%. We evaluated characteristics, efficacy, satisfaction and adverse reactions in treatment of premature ejaculation with 8 topical agents. RESULTS: In concerning of their odor, SS-sream(R) was the strongest (p<0.05). The viscosity was the highest in cream-type agent as SS-cream(R). However washing after sexual intercourse is relatively easy in every cases with the lowest necessity of washing in solution-type E.L.T soln(R) (p<0.05). The main causes of feeling the usage of drugs by partners were delay of ejaculation time, feeling of foreign bodies in genital organ, and the odor of drugs itself. Except SS-cream(R) with 60 minutes, the interval time of drug effect was about 15 to 20 minutes in every cases without any significant difference as well as adequate duration of drug efficacy. The times of usage per one pack was more in both E.L.T(R). soln which was make-up compact-type, and Sanova(R), Tstone(R) which was spray-type than the rest of drugs which were contained in disposal pack or tube. Also E.L.T soln(R), Sanova(R) and Tstone(R) had showed the convenience of usage (p<0.05). With overall satisfaction, there was excellent convenience of usage in E.L.T. soln which was packed in make-up compact (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Topical anesthetic agents designed for premature ejaculation are safe and effective medical treatment with no significant difference in their characteristics, efficacy, and occurrence of adverse reaction among the various topical agents. Therefore, we suggest that the most important factors which influence the satisfaction and selectivity to topical anesthetic agents for premature ejaculations are the preserving container and method of application.
