Methodology for Developing Patient Guideline （3）：Reporting Frameworks and Presentation
10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2024.22.005
- VernacularTitle:患者指南制定方法（三）
- Author:
Lijiao YAN
1
;
Ning LIANG
1
;
Haili ZHANG
1
;
Nannan SHI
1
;
Ziyu TIAN
2
;
Ruixiang WANG
3
;
Xiaojia NI
4
;
Yufang HAO
5
;
Wei CHEN
6
;
Yingfeng ZHOU
7
;
Dan YANG
5
;
Shuyu YANG
8
;
Yujing ZHANG
1
;
Ziteng HU
1
;
Jianping LIU
6
Author Information
1. Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine，China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences，Beijing，100700
2. Institute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion，China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
3. The University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital
4. Guangdong Province Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital
5. School of Nursing，Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
6. School of Traditional Chinese Medicine，Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
7. School of Nursing，Fudan University，Fudan University，China
8. The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
patient guideline;
patient versions of guideline;
recommendations;
reporting frameworks;
presentation
- From:
Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
2024;65(22):2304-2309
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Standardized reporting is a crucial factor affecting the use of patient guidelines （PGs）， particularly in the reporting and presentation of recommendations. This paper introduced the current status of PG reporting， including the research on PG content and presentation formats， and provided comprehensive recommendations for PG reporting from aspects such as overall framework， recommendations， presentation format， and readability. First， the presentation of PG recommendations should include clearly defined clinical questions， recommendations and their rationale， and guidance on how patients should implement the interventions； for specific content in the PG， such as level of evidence， level of recommendation， it is recommended to explain in text the reasons for giving different levels of recommendation， i.e.， to present the logic behind giving the level of recommendation to the patient； additional information needed in the recommendation framework should be supplemented by tracing references or authoritative textbooks and literature that support the recommendations. Subsequently， the PG text should be written based on the Reporting Checklist for Public Versions of Guidelines （RIGHT-PVG） reporting framework. Finally， to enhance readability and comprehension， it is recommended to refer to the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool （PEMAT） for translating PG content. To enhance the readability of PGs， it is suggested to present the PG content in a persona-lized and layered manner.
