Comparison of the efficacy and safety of suction ureteral stent and conventional ureteral stent in the treatment of urinary calculi
10.3969/j.issn.1009-8291.2024.05.006
- VernacularTitle:吸引式输尿管支架与常规输尿管支架治疗泌尿系结石的疗效及安全性比较
- Author:
Yankuang GUO
1
;
Zhiqiang RAN
;
Tianbo LI
;
Geng HUANG
;
Dingwen GUI
Author Information
1. 武汉科技大学医学院,湖北武汉 430062
- Keywords:
suction ureteral stent;
magnetic tube extractor;
double J tube;
urinary calculi;
holmium laser lithotripsy
- From:
Journal of Modern Urology
2024;29(5):412-416
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of suction ureteral stent and conventional ureteral stent in the treatment of patients with urinary calculi,so as to evaluate the clinical application value.Methods A total of 196 patients with urinary calculi admitted to in our hospital during Dec.2022 and May 2023 were selected to undergo ureteral holmium laser lithotripsy with hard ureteroscopy or soft ureteroscopy,including 100 with suction ureteral stent(suction group)and 96 with conventional ureteral stent(conventional group).Basic data,visual analog scale(VAS),extubation time,extubation success rate,gross hematuria,lumbar and abdominal pain,and urinary tract infection were compared between the two groups.Results Compared with the conventional group,the suction group had lower VAS[(2.94±1.24)vs.(5.78±1.50)],shorter extubation time[(4.28±0.51)min vs.(13.51±1.81)min],and the differences were statistically significant(P＜0.01).After extubation,the suction group had a lower incidence of complications(P＜0.05).Conclusion Compared with conventional ureteral stent,extraction of suction ureteral stent has the advantages of simpler operation,better patient comfort,fewer complications,shorter extubation time and lower medical costs.
