Cross-sectional study on working mode and human resource setting of PIVAS in national medical institutions
- VernacularTitle:全国医疗机构PIVAS工作模式和人力资源设置的横断面研究
- Author:
Ke LI
1
;
Hongyan GU
1
;
Dechun JIANG
1
;
Lulu SUN
2
;
Yingbo ZHAO
2
Author Information
1. Dept. of Pharmacy，Beijing Shijitan Hospital，Capital Medical University，Beijing 100038，China
2. National Institute of Hospital Administration，National Health Commission，Beijing 100044，China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
pharmacy intravenous admixture services;
working mode;
human resources;
cross-sectional study
- From:
China Pharmacy
2024;35(18):2199-2202
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE To know about the working mode and human resource status of pharmacy intravenous admixture services （PIVAS） in national medical institutions. METHODS Through questionnaire survey， the national PIVAS was invited to fill out questionnaire and statistical analysis was performed on the effective sample data related to PIVAS working mode and human resources in the questionnaire. RESULTS In this study， 761 PIVAS from 722 medical institutions of 29 provinces were involved in the questionnaire survey， with 471 valid questionnaires for working mode and 441 valid questionnaires for human resources survey. In terms of working mode， among 471 PIVAS， 292 PIVAS （62.0%） were in pharmacist-alone mode， and 176 PIVAS （37.4%） were in pharmacist-nurse cooperative mode； there was no significant difference in the types of medical orders received by PIVAS between these two working modes except for the other medical orders （P＞0.05）. In terms of human resource setting， among 441 PIVAS， the average number of total staff of single PIVAS was 24（16，33）， including 11（6，19） pharmacists， 7（2，13） nursing staff， and 3（1，5） workers； there was a statistically significant difference in the number of personnel among three groups （P＜ 0.01）. The per capita income of PIVAS respondents in 2019 was [7.9（4.8，10.7）]×104 yuan， and in 2021 it was [8.8（5.8，11.7）]× 104 yuan， with an increase of 9.0% compared to 2019. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant （P＜ 0.01）. CONCLUSIONS Medical institutions’ PIVAS in China had not fully implemented the pharmacist-alone work model， and some medical institutions had chosen a pharmacist-nurse cooperative mode. It is suggested that relevant departments formulate corresponding qualification requirements and training standards for nursing personnel as soon as possible based on sufficient research on PIVAS’s demand for nursing professionals.
