3D simulation of interosseous interference in sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular asymmetry
10.1186/s40902-023-00400-x
- Author:
Santhiya Iswarya VINOTHINI UDAYAKUMAR 1
1
;
Dohyoung KIM
;
So‑Young CHOI
;
Tae‑Geon KWON
Author Information
1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, 2177 Dalgubeol‑Daero, Jung‑Gu, Daegu 41940, Republic of Korea
- Publication Type:RESEARCH
- From:Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
2023;45(1):32-
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Background:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pattern of predicted interosseous interference and to determine the influencing factor to volume of bony interference using a computer-assisted simulation system. This retrospective study recruited 116 patients with mandibular prognathism who had undergone sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) with or without maxillary osteotomy. The patients were divided into 3 groups accord‑ ing to the amount of menton (Me) deviation: less than 2 mm (Group 1), 2–4 mm (Group 2), and more than 4 mm (Group 3). Changes in the distal segments following BSSRO and the volume of the interosseous interference between the proximal and distal segments were simulated after matching preoperative occlusion and postoperative expected occlusion with the cone-beam computed tomography data. Ramal inclinations and other skeletal measure‑ ments were analyzed before surgery, immediately after surgery, and at least 6 months after surgery.
Results:The anticipated interosseous interference was more frequently noted on the contralateral side of chin deviation (long side) than the deviated site (short side) in Groups 2 and 3. More interference volume was predicted at the long side (186 ± 343.9 mm 3 ) rather than the short side (54.4 ± 124.4 mm 3 ) in Group 3 (p = 0.033). The bilateral difference in the volume of the interosseous interference of the osteotomized mandible was significantly correlated with the Me deviation (r = − 0.257, p = 0.009) and bilateral ramal inclination (r= 0.361, p < 0.001). The predictor variable that affected the volume of the osseous interference at each side was the amount of Me deviation (p = 0.010).
Conclusion:By using the 3D simulation system, the potential site of bony collision could be visualized and success‑ fully reduced intraoperatively. Since the osseous interference can be existed on any side, unilaterally or bilaterally, 3D surgical simulation is necessary before surgery to predict the osseous interference and improve the ramal inclination.
