Analysis of 29 Targeted Genes for Non-Obstructive Azoospermia: The Relationship between Genetic Testing and Testicular Histology
- Author:
Rossella CANNARELLA
1
;
Matteo BERTELLI
;
Rosita A. CONDORELLI
;
Marija VILAJ
;
Sandro La VIGNERA
;
Davor JEZEK
;
Aldo E. CALOGERO
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:The World Journal of Men's Health 2023;41(2):422-433
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Purpose:To analyze the presence of potentially pathogenic variants of 29 candidate genes known to cause spermatogenic failure (SPGF) in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) who underwent testicular histology.
Materials and Methods:Forty-eight patients with unexplained NOA referred to the Department of Transfusion Medicine and Transplantation Biology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia for testicular biopsy. They were divided into three groups: those who had cryptorchidism (n=9), those with varicocele (n=14), and those with idiopathic NOA (n=25). All included patients underwent blood withdrawal for next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis and gene sequencing.
Results:We found a possible genetic cause in 4 patients with idiopathic NOA (16%) and in 2 with cryptorchidism (22%). No pathogenic or possibly pathogenic mutations were identified in patients with varicocele. Variants of undetermined significance (VUS) were found in 11 patients with idiopathic NOA (44%), 3 with cryptorchidism (33%), and 8 patients with varicocele (57%). VUSs of the USP9Y gene were the most frequently as they were found in 14 out of 48 patients (29%). In particular, the VUS USP9Y c.7434+14del was found in 11 patients. They showed varied histological pictures, including Sertoli cell-only syndrome, mixed atrophy, and hypospermatogenesis, regardless of cryptorchidism or varicocele. No direct correlation was found between the gene mutation/variant and the testicular histological picture.
Conclusions:Different mutations of the same gene cause various testicular histological pictures. These results suggest that it is not the gene itself but the type of mutation/variation that determines the testicular histology picture. Based on the data presented above, it remains challenging to design a genetic panel with prognostic value for the outcome of testicular sperm extraction in patients with NOA.
