Analysis of the current status of health facility development in Shanghai
10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2024.23102
- VernacularTitle:上海市健康场所建设的现况分析
- Author:
Fenfen QIAO
1
;
Gang XU
2
;
Xiaomin WEI
1
;
Huilin LIU
1
;
Zongmin JIANG
1
;
Hui WANG
2
Author Information
1. Shanghai Health Promotion Center,Shanghai 200040, China
2. School of Public Health,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200025, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
health facility;
organizational management;
healthy environment;
health activity;
health outcome
- From:
Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine
2024;36(7):619-623
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo compare the development status of health facilities in different regions （non-agricultural and agricultural districts）and different types across four dimensions： organizational management， health environment， health activities， and health outcomes， to explore factors that may affect the current development status and summarize effective experiences， and to provide a foundation for the subsequent comprehensive， standardized， and effective promotion of health facility development and tiered and classified management. MethodsInvestigators conducted a health status survey based on the four dimensions for 50 health facilities in 16 districts of Shanghai， representing three types （including government agencies， enterprises， and communities）. Evaluation forms were filled out through on-site observation and document reviews， which were developed in accordance with the Shanghai Health Settings Evaluation Standards （for trial implementation in 2019）. ResultsThe average total score of health facilities in Shanghai was （88.42±11.93） points， with an overall excellence rate of 86.0%. The excellence rate of each dimension， from highest to lowest， were healthy environment （84.0%）， organizational management （82.0%）， health activities （78.0%）， and health outcomes （44.0%）. Health facilities in agricultural districts scored higher in both total score and average score on the organizational management dimension compared to non-agricultural districts. The excellence rate for the organizational management dimension was also higher in agricultural districts than in non-agricultural districts. There was no statistical significance in the total score， the score of each dimension， the overall excellence rate， and the excellence rate of each dimension among different types of health facilities （P>0.05）. ConclusionThe development of health facilities among government agencies， enterprises， and communities in Shanghai has begun to yield positive results. Health facilities in non-agricultural districts should actively draw on the experience of those in agricultural districts， particularly in organizational management， adjust development ideas and planning based on their own realities， so as to continuously improve the levels of development.
