Feedback, workshop, and random monitoring as quality assurance interventions in improving data entries of residents in electronic medical records of UP Health Service for COVID-19 teleconsultations.
- Author:
Geannagail O. Anuran
1
;
Marishiel D. Mejia-Samonte
1
;
Kashmir Mae B. Engada
1
;
Shiela Marie S. Laviña
1
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords: Quality Assurance; Chart Audit
- MeSH: Electronic Medical Records
- From: Acta Medica Philippina 2024;58(13):56-61
- CountryPhilippines
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND
Medical records provide a repository of patient information, physical examination, laboratory findings, and the outcomes of interventions. The completeness of data contained in the electronic medical record (EMR) is an important factor leading to health service improvement. Quality assurance (QA) activities have been utilized to improve documentation in electronic medical records.
OBJECTIVETo determine the effectiveness of QA interventions (feedback, workshop, and random monitoring system) in improving completeness of data entries in the EMR of resident physicians for COVID-19 teleconsultations.
METHODSThis was a before-and-after study involving EMR entries of physician trainees on health care workers (HCWs) from March to October 2022 of the COVID-19 pandemic. A chart audit was conducted against a checklist of criteria for three months before and after the interventions. QA interventions included the provision of feedback on the results of the initial chart review; conducting a QA workshop on setting of standards, chart audit, data encoding, analysis, and presentation; and random monitoring/feedback of resident charting. The change in the level of completeness from pre- to post-intervention was computed, and the percentage of charts meeting the minimum standard of 90% completeness was likewise determined.
RESULTSA total of 362 and 591 chart entries were audited before and after the interventions. The average percentage of completeness of medical records during initial consultation improved from 83% to 95% (p>0.05). The documentation of the reason for seeking consultation significantly increased from < 1% to 84%. The reporting of past exposure and level of risk decreased to 89% (p=0.001) in the initial consult and 12% (p=0.001) in the fit-to-work, respectively. Majority of the criteria for work clearance improved after the intervention. However, the average completeness of entries did not reach 90% post-intervention for fit-to-work consultations.
CONCLUSIONFeedback, quality assurance workshop, and random monitoring of electronic medical records are effective in increasing documentation practices for the chief complaint and dates of illness duration but showed non-significant increasing trend on overall percentage of EMR completeness for COVID-19 teleconsultations.
- Full text:20240829090845104639.pdf