Comparison of Continuous Three-in-One Block and Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia for Postoperative Pain after Total Knee Replacement.
10.4097/kjae.2006.51.1.76
- Author:
Chang Kil PARK
1
;
Jung Ha CHO
;
Choon Kyu CHO
;
Young Ju KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Eulji University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea. pck@emc.eulji.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial
- Keywords:
bupivacaine;
continuous 3-in-1 block;
patient-controlled analgesia;
total knee replacement
- MeSH:
Analgesia;
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled*;
Anesthesia;
Anesthesia, Spinal;
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee*;
Bupivacaine;
Butorphanol;
Catheters;
Convalescence;
Epinephrine;
Humans;
Ketorolac;
Knee;
Length of Stay;
Nausea;
Pain, Postoperative*;
Passive Cutaneous Anaphylaxis;
Rehabilitation;
Visual Analog Scale;
Vomiting
- From:Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
2006;51(1):76-81
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Severe postoperative pain can delay knee rehabilitation and prolong the duration of convalescence after a total knee replacement (TKR). This study compared a continuous 3-in-1 block using a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) technique and IV PCA for analgesia after a unilateral TKR. METHODS: Forty patients scheduled for an elective TKR under spinal anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 received an IV PCA with butorphanol and ketorolac. Group 2 received a continuous 3-in-1 block performed with 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and epinephrine 1 : 200,000, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine through a femoral catheter at a rate of 2 ml/h plus 1 ml PCA boluses of a lockout time of 10 min. The level of pain was assessed at rest and during continuous passive motion using a visual analog scale (VAS). The VAS pain scores, nausea and vomiting were recorded in the postanesthetic care unit, at 6 PM on the day of operation, and at 8 AM and 6 PM on postoperative days 1 and 2, respectively. The duration of surgery, anesthesia time, blood loss, and hospital stay were compared. RESULTS: The patients in Group 2 reported lower VAS pain scores than those in Group 1 (P < 0.05). The duration of surgery, nausea and vomiting, blood loss, and hospital stay were similar in the two groups except for the anesthesia time. CONCLUSIONS: A continuous 3-in-1 block with a PCA technique provides better pain relief than IV PCA with butorphanol and ketorolac after TKR.
