A systematic review in health economics research on the expansion of human papilloma virus vaccination population to men.
10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20230313-00180
- Author:
Ying SU
1
;
Han Qing HE
2
;
Yang ZHOU
2
;
Xuan DENG
2
Author Information
1. School of Public Health, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, China.
2. Department of Immunization Program, Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou 310051, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Adult;
Adolescent;
Humans;
Male;
Female;
Child;
Human Papillomavirus Viruses;
Homosexuality, Male;
Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control*;
Sexual and Gender Minorities;
Cost-Benefit Analysis;
Vaccination;
Immunization;
Papillomavirus Vaccines
- From:
Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine
2023;57(11):1869-1877
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To systematically collect and evaluate the health economics research of Human papilloma virus(HPV) vaccination population expansion to men, and to provide evidence for optimizing HPV vaccine immunization strategies. Methods: Health economics research studies on male HPV vaccination published in databases including PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang Database from January 2010 to September 2022 were collected according to the systematic evaluation research design. The quality of the studies was assessed using the health economics evaluation reporting standards (2022 edition) (CHEERS 2022), with full score of 28. The results of the studies were reviewed and analyzed systematically. Results: A total of 21 studies complies with the criteria were included, all of which was foreign research. The average CHEERS score of the literatures was 25.71 points, range from 23 to 28 points. 85.71% (12/14) studies of the gender-neutral population showed that including male in HPV vaccination were more consistent with the cost effectiveness than female vaccination alone under certain conditions (target at adolescents of 10 to 15 years old or adults under 26 years old). 80.00% (4/5) of the studies target at ordinary men only were proved that male vaccination with HPV vaccine was in line with the cost-effectiveness. 2 studies targeting men who have sex with men (MSM) were both concluded that it met the cost-effectiveness. In addition, the results of 2 gender-neutral population studies and 1 study on men alone showed that extending HPV vaccination to men did not conform to cost effectiveness. The main reasons for the non-cost-effectiveness included the high price of vaccines and the age of vaccination. Conclusion: The quality of the health economics evaluation studies on expanding HPV vaccination to the male population is high. Vaccination targeting adolescents and young men as well as special groups (such as MSM) are likely to be cost-effective, and vaccinations for other groups are still need further evaluated. It is recommended that relevant research should be conducted to provide evidence for expanding the scope of HPV vaccination to men in China.
