Efficacy of plasma treatment for surface cleansing and osseointegration of sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants
10.4047/jap.2024.16.3.189
- Author:
Gang-Ho BAE
1
;
Won-Tak CHO
;
Jong-Ho LEE
;
Jung-Bo HUH
Author Information
1. Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Research Institute, Dental and Life Sciences Institute, Education and Research Team for Life Science on Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
2024;16(3):189-199
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE:This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of plasma treatment of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) titanium implants on surface cleansing and osseointegration in a beagle model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:For morphological analysis and XPS analysis, scanning electron microscope and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy were used to analyze the surface topography and chemical compositions of implant before and after plasma treatment. For this animal experiment, twelve SLA titanium implants were divided into two groups:a control group (untreated implants) and a plasma group (implants treated with plasma). Each group was randomly located in the mandibular bone of the beagle dog (n = 6). After 8 weeks, the beagle dogs were sacrificed, and volumetric analysis and histometric analysis were performed within the region of interest.
RESULTS:In morphological analysis, plasma treatment did not alter the implant surface topography or cause any physical damage. In XPS analysis, the atomic percentage of carbon at the inspection point before the plasma treatment was 34.09%. After the plasma treatment, it was reduced to 18.74%, indicating a 45% reduction in carbon. In volumetric analysis and histometric analysis, the plasma group exhibited relatively higher mean values for new bone volume (NBV), bone to implant contact (BIC), and inter-thread bone density (ITBD) compared to the control group. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > .05).
CONCLUSION:Within the limits of this study, plasma treatment effectively eliminated hydrocarbons without changing the implant surface.
