Cephalomedullary Nailing with an Additional Cannulated Screw Fixation in Basicervical Femur Fractures
10.12671/jkfs.2024.37.1.22
- Author:
Keong-Hwan KIM
1
;
Woo Dong NAM
;
Yeon Sik HEO
;
Gu-Hee JUNG
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
- Publication Type:ORIGINAL ARTICLE
- From:Journal of the Korean Fracture Society
2024;37(1):22-29
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:EN
-
Abstract:
Purpose:The purpose of this study is to analyze the clinical results of patients with basicervical fractureundergoing cephalomedullary nailing (CMN) with an additional cannulated screw fixation compared to only performing CMN. We hypothesized that a difference may exist in the clinical outcomes if an ad-ditional screw is fixed with CMN compared to only performing CMN in basicervical fracture.
Materials and Methods:A total of 28 consecutive patients who underwent CMN for basicervical fracture were included. In 9 cases, only CMN was conducted, and in 19 cases, an additional cannulated screw fixation was performed with CMN. Bone union, sliding distance, reduction status, and fixation failure were evaluated by postoperative radiography, and ambulatory ability was evaluated by functional results. These findings were compared between a group of CMN and a group of CMN with an additional cannulated screw.
Results:There were 4 males and 24 females with a mean age of 84 years (range, 69–100 years). No significant difference was found in postoperative reduction, tip-apex distance, bone union, and walking function recovery after surgery between the two groups, but in the sliding distance of the lag screw, the CMN group demonstrated more sliding (6.2 mm [range, 2.5–13.4 mm] vs 3.5 mm [range, 0.1– 9.2 mm]; p=0.045). Among the two groups, only one case of fixation failure at the postoperative four months was observed in the CMN group (p=0.321), and hemiarthroplasty with nail construct removal was performed.
Conclusion:CMN with additional cannulated screw fixation is a safe and reliable surgical option in basicervical fracture. It provided favorable clinical outcomes and may be a good alternative for treating basicervical fracture.
