A Study on the Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (K-ISMI).
- Author:
Tae Yeon HWANG
1
;
Woo Kyung LEE
;
Eun Seun HAN
;
Eui Jung KWON
Author Information
1. WHO Collaborating Center for Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Community Mental Health, Yongin Mental Hospital, Yongin, Korea. lilymh@dreamwiz.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Internalized stigma;
Alienation;
Perceived discrimination;
Stigma resistance
- MeSH:
Axis, Cervical Vertebra;
Depression;
Depressive Disorder;
Discrimination (Psychology);
Emigrants and Immigrants;
Epidemiologic Studies;
Humans;
Reproducibility of Results*;
Self Concept;
Weights and Measures
- From:Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association
2006;45(5):418-426
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: The Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness (ISMI) scale designed to measure the subjective experience of stigma with sub-scales measuring Alienation, Stereotype Endorsement, Perceived Discrimination, Stigma Resistance, and Social withdrawal. The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Korean version of ISMI. METHODS: The subjects were 194 schizophrenic patients and 205 peoples with depressive disorder. K-ISMI, CES-D (The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale) and Self Esteem scale were performed. RESULTS: Results showed that the ISMI had high internal consistence and split-half reliabilities. The internal consistency coefficients (Cronbach alpha) of each subscale ranged from .83 to .93. The validity of the ISMI was investigated by principal axis factoring analysis, yielding 5 factors of alienation, perceived discrimination, negative stereotype, stigma resistance, devaluation and social withdrawal. 5 subscales explained 60.67% of total variance. Concurrent validity was supported by comparisons against scales measuring related constructs. As expected, the ISMI had positive correlations with CES-D, and it had negative correlation with self-esteem scale. Subsidiary analysis showed that schizophrenic patients showed higher internalized stigma than depressed patients. CONCLUSION: Overall, the findings support the utility of ISMI as a tool to evaluate internalized stigma of persons with mental illness. Interventions that can lessen internalized stigma may well hasten the recovery process in individuals with mental illness.
