Oncologic Outcomes of Immediate Breast Reconstruction in the Setting of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Long-term Follow-up Study of a Matched Cohort
- Author:
Dong Seung SHIN
1
;
Yoon Ju BANG
;
Joon Young CHOI
;
Sung Yoon JANG
;
Hyunjun LEE
;
Youngji KWAK
;
Byung Joo CHAE
;
Jonghan YU
;
Jeong Eon LEE
;
Seok Won KIM
;
Seok Jin NAM
;
Byung-Joon JEON
;
Jai Kyong PYON
;
Goo-Hyun MUN
;
Kyeong-Tae LEE
;
Jai Min RYU
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:Journal of Breast Cancer 2024;27(1):14-26
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:EN
-
Abstract:
Purpose:Despite the increasing use of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR), its oncologic safety in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) needs to be comprehensively clarified in breast cancer management. The objective of the present study was to analyze the oncologic safety of IBR following NACT.
Methods:In total, 587 patients with breast cancer who underwent a total mastectomy (TM) with IBR after NACT between 2008 and 2017 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. The reviewed patients with IBR following skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) or nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) were matched 1:3 to patients who underwent TM alone after NACT. Matching variables included age, clinical T and N stages before NACT, response to NACT, pathologic T and N stages, and molecular subtypes.
Results:After propensity score matching, 95 patients who underwent IBR following SSM/ NSM after NACT (IBR group) and 228 patients who underwent TM alone after NACT (TM group) were selected. The median follow-up period was 73 (range, 5–181) months after matching. After matching, there were no significant differences between the two groups in 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (88.8% vs. 91.2%, p = 0.516), disease-free survival (67.3% vs. 76.6%, p = 0.099), distant metastasis-free survival (71.9% vs. 81.9%, p = 0.057), or overall survival (84.1% vs. 91.5, p = 0.061) rates. In multivariate analyses, conducting IBR was not associated with increased risks for locoregional recurrence, any recurrence, distant metastasis, or overall death.
Conclusion:Our findings suggest that IBR following SSM/NSM elicits comparable long-term oncologic outcomes to those of TM alone in the setting of NACT.
