Operational status of Korean emergency medical institutions in preparation for infectious disease outbreak after COVID-19 pandemic: 1 year later
- Author:
Young Jun CHO
1
;
Sungbae MOON
;
Hyun Wook RYOO
;
Jae Yun AHN
;
Jinhui PAIK
;
Eujene JUNG
;
Joo JEONG
;
Wook Jin CHOI
;
Ki Jeong HONG
Author Information
1. Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine
2023;34(6):568-585
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
Objective:A regional pandemic may result in a crisis in providing emergency care to the community and disrupt emergency medical services. This study examined how the recent coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic impacted emergency department (ED) preparedness nationwide by describing the current ED operations.
Methods:A cross-sectional survey was developed and distributed nationwide to emergency physicians. All 57 severe emergency care centers and 35 selected local emergency medical institutions nationwide were invited to participate. The survey consisted of basic ED information, infection guidelines, and operations for ED, preemptive pretriage area details, ED quarantine area details, cohort isolation and preemptive quarantine area, and difficulties or problems in treating infectious patients.
Results:Forty-nine severe emergency care centers (86%) and 24 (68.6%) local emergency medical institutions answered the survey. Most EDs (95.9% and 91.7% of severe emergency care centers and local emergency medical institutions, respectively) operated under infection guidelines. In addition, 51% and 72.3% of preemptive pretriage areas in severe emergency care centers and local emergency medical institutions, respectively, placed doctors. Both negative and normal pressurized ED quarantine areas were more placed in severe emergency care centers (3 and 3 vs. 0.5 and 1 of severe emergency care centers and local emergency medical institutions, respectively). In severe emergency care centers, the preemptive quarantine areas were operated more than the cohort isolation areas (63.3% vs. 40.8%). Common difficulties expressed by EDs were delayed polymerase chain reaction test results (4.5 and 4.1 of severe emergency care centers and local emergency medical institutions, respectively) and a fear of infection with ED shutdown (4.4 and 4.1 of severe emergency care centers and local emergency medical institutions, respectively).
Conclusion:This study surveyed how ED care was changed by the pandemic and how current resources are redeployed nationwide. These results may be used as a basis for future ED pandemic preparedness.
