Outcomes and Adverse Events After Bariatric Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, 2013–2023
10.17476/jmbs.2023.12.2.76
- Author:
Jane Chungyoon KIM
1
;
Min-Gyu KIM
;
Jae Kyun PARK
;
Seungho LEE
;
Jeesun KIM
;
Yo-Seok CHO
;
Seong-Ho KONG
;
Do Joong PARK
;
Hyuk-Joon LEE
;
Han-Kwang YANG
Author Information
1. Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:Journal of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery
2023;12(2):76-88
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Purpose:Bariatric surgery is an increasingly common treatment for obesity and related comorbidities. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of bariatric surgery and medical treatment (MT).
Materials and Methods:A systematic search of articles published from January 2013 to May 2023 identified 20 studies. The treatment arms included Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), sleeve gastrectomy (SG), gastric banding, and MT. The assessed outcomes included body weight loss, diabetes mellitus (DM) remission, changes in dyslipidemia and hypertension markers, and adverse events.
Results:Bariatric surgery resulted in significantly better short- and long-term weight loss than MT, with RYGB and SG showing the most substantial reduction. The DM remission rates were notably higher in the surgery group, with marked improvements in hemoglobin A1c and fasting glucose levels. Improvements in dyslipidemia were inconclusive, whereas hypertension showed modest improvements, particularly with RYGB. Complication rates varied, with RYGB reporting higher rates of early complications, and SG reporting increased rates of late complications. The perioperative reoperation rates were low across all surgical treatments. Specific adverse events, such as intestinal obstruction and anastomosis site problems, were more common in the RYGB group, whereas reflux symptoms were more common in the SG group.
Conclusion:Bariatric surgery, especially RYGB and SG, provided superior weight loss and DM remission outcomes compared to MT, although with varied complication profiles. These findings underscore the need for careful patient selection and postoperative management in bariatric surgery. Future studies should aim to refine these processes to improve patient outcomes.
