Analysis of on-site technical evaluation of 88 provincial health enterprises in Shandong Province
10.20001/j.issn.2095-2619.20240422
- VernacularTitle:山东省88家省级健康企业现场技术评估分析
- Author:
Wenjiao LIU
1
;
Jing LI
;
Zhifeng YANG
;
Yuqian CHANG
;
Haidong ZHANG
;
Peng LI
Author Information
1. Yantai Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Yantai, Shandong 264003, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Health enterprises;
Construction;
Assessment;
On-site survey;
Enterprise;
Industry;
Health promotion
- From:
China Occupational Medicine
2024;51(2):238-241
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo analyze the on-site technical evaluation results of the provincial-level health enterprises in Shandong Province. Methods A total of 88 provincial-level health enterprises in Shandong Province in 2021 were selected as the research subjects using the convenient sampling method. The scores of on-site technical assessments were analyzed. Results The total score of on-site technical evaluations for the 88 provincial health enterprises was (942.1±21.8) points. The scores for the first-level indicators, including management system, health environment, health management and services, and health culture, were (193.7±4.7), (191.6±5.2), (414.4±16.4), and (142.3±6.7) points, respectively. The score for health culture in large-sized enterprises was higher than that in medium-sized and below enterprises (P<0.05). State-owned enterprises had higher total scores than private enterprises and joint-stock enterprises (both P<0.05). The score for health management and services in the mining industry was higher than that in the manufacturing industry (P<0.05). Enterprises with high total investment in health promotion had higher scores for health culture than those with low investment (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the scores for indicators of management system and health environment among enterprises of different sizes, natures, industries, and total investments in health promotion (all P>0.05). Conclusion The overall score of these 88 enterprises was higher than the standard for provincial health enterprises. Except for management systems and general environment, there were some differences in the scores for health management and services, and health culture assessments among enterprises of different sizes, natures, industries, and total investments in health promotion.
