Comparison of clinical efficacy of laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair (TEP) and traditional hernia repair in inguinal hernia
- VernacularTitle:腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)与传统疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床疗效对比
- Author:
Jianming CHEN
1
;
Guoping CHEN
;
Kai TU
Author Information
1. 福州市第二医院普外科
- Keywords:
Traditional hernia repair;
Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair;
Inguinal hernia;
Complication
- From:
China Modern Doctor
2018;56(15):51-53
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair(TEP) and traditional hernia repair in the treatment of inguinal hernia. Methods 94 inguinal hernia patients admitted in our hospital from January 2014 to August 2017 were randomly divided into two groups. 45 patients in the control group received conventional hernia repair and 49 patients in the study group received laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair. The clinical treatment effects between the two groups were compared. Results The overall incidence of complications in the study group was 4. 08％, which was lower than 17. 78％ in the control group(P＜0. 05). The hospitalization cost of the study group was higher than that of the control group. The hospitalization time, postoperative pain time and operation time in the study group was lower than that in the control group (P＜0. 05). The recurrence rate (0％) in the study group was lower than 6. 67％ in the control group(P＜0. 05). There was no significant difference in SDSand SASscores between the two groups before treatment(P＞0. 05). After treatment, the scores in the study group were lower than those in the control group(P＜0. 05). Conclusion It is recommended to use TEPfor clinical treatment of inguinal hernia. Although this method is more expensive than conventional hernia repair, it can reduce the incidence of complications and make the disease recover quickly. It has great application value.
