A clinical control study of screws through fractured pedical arch operat-ing method versus traditional operating method for thoracolumbar burst fracture
- VernacularTitle:伤椎置钉内固定治疗胸腰椎爆裂性骨折的疗效评价
- Author:
Zhiyong YU
1
;
Long BAI
;
Jun YE
;
Keming CHEN
;
Longbo LIN
;
Dazhou LIU
Author Information
1. 深圳市宝安区福永人民医院骨科
- Keywords:
Thoracolumbar burst fracture;
Screws through fractured pedical arch;
Internal fixation
- From:
China Modern Doctor
2014;(27):8-10
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinical effect of the two operating methods: screws through fractured pedical arch operating method versus traditional operating method in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures, to confirm the clinical advantages of screws through fractured pedical arch operating method in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. Methods A total of 62 cases suffered from thoracolumbar burst fractures were divided into two groups:screws through fractured pedical arch operating method group (n=27) and traditional operating method group (n=35). Each group was undergone the corresponding operation. The clinical results were evaluated between two groups. Results Patients in the screws through fractured pedical arch group by contrast to traditional group, margin height, Cobb's angle, internal fixation failure rates and area of vertebral canal were different, there was significant differences (P<0.01). Conclusion Screws through fractured pedical arch operating method had many advantages, which had a promising clinical applica-tion in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures.
