The study of without needle stitch closure in gynaecology cesarean section incision
- VernacularTitle:无针缝合器闭合剖宫产术切口临床研究
- Author:
Liying WANG
1
;
Liqiu ZU
;
Zenghui LI
;
Sheng SUN
Author Information
1. 河北省抚宁县人民医院妇产科
- Keywords:
Needle without stitch;
Cesarean section;
Skin incision;
Wound scar width
- From:
China Modern Doctor
2014;(18):154-156
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To study the clinical offect of without needle stitch closure in gynaecology cesarean section in-cision. Methods A total of 300 cases of cesarean section surgery (new lower uterine segment cesarean section) were randomly divided into, experimental group and the control group with 150 cases in each. Experimental group were giv-en needle suture closed incision of skin and the control group were given traditional needle suture skin incision. The time skin, the skin suture incision scar wound unit length, hospitalization days, primary healing of incision, increase of the number of cases and adverse reactions were compared. Results Needle without stitch machine skin incision was (2.71±0.96) seconds, hospitalization days was (5.06±0.31) days, the wound of scar width was (0.21±0.13) cm, which were significantly lower than that in the traditional needle stitch suture incision skin (5.87 ±1.62) seconds, hospitaliza-tion days (6.12±1.84) days, the wound of scar width (5.56±2.32) cm. The differences between the two groups were sta-tistically significant (P < 0.05). Two groups of wound were primary healing rate was 99.33%.Experimental group pa-tients postoperative day 1 incision, 1 case of itching, accounted for 0.7%, control group itching 3 cases, accounted 2.0%, compared two groups had no difference(P>0.05);only 3 days postoperatively itchy in 1 case. Conclusion Com-pared accounte dwith the traditional way, needle without stitch machine can shorten the skin incision, and significantly reduce the skin wound scar width. Which does not affect the primary healing of incision and less adverse reaction.
