Effects of double balloon catheter and dinoprostone suppositories on ma-turing cervix and parturifacient action
- VernacularTitle:双球囊导管和地诺前列酮栓促宫颈成熟和引产效果比较研究
- Author:
Jingping ZHU
1
;
Li LIU
;
Shaoping ZHONG
;
Xiaoyu ZHOU
;
Jiamei GE
Author Information
1. 浙江省嘉兴市妇幼保健院 嘉兴市市立三一医院
- Keywords:
Labor induction;
Cervical dilation;
Double balloon catheter;
Controlled-release dinoprostone suppository;
Promoting cervical ripening
- From:
China Modern Doctor
2014;(14):152-155
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the efficacy of double balloon catheter and dinoprostone suppositories on maturing cervix and parturifacient action. Methods A total of 382 full-term nulliparous women (200) cases in double balloon group and 182 cases in dinoprostone suppositories medicine group) with labour induction indications and unfavourable cervices (Bishop score≤5scores) were collected for retrospective analysis. The promoting effects of the two methods on cervical ripening, 24-hour vaginal delivery rates and inductiondelivery intervals were compared. Results There was no difference in ceasarean delivery rates between two groups (25.5% vs 24.2%, P=0.67). Dinoprostone suppositories was more effective in promoting cervical ripening (2.68±0.87 vs 2.44±0.74, P<0.01). The induction-to-delivery interval was longer in the double balloon group (19.86±12.96)h than that in the medicine group(17.13±2.56)h (P<0.01). Conclusion Labour induction in nullipara with unfavourable cervices improve delivery rates. Dinoprostone suppositories is better than double balloon in promoting cervical ripening.
