A scoping review of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) telepractice research (2002-2021)
- Author:
Ellyn Cassey K. Chua
1
;
Joseph Reuben G. Manansala
1
;
Danielle Anne G. Tee
1
,
2
;
Margarita Janela A. Lirio
1
;
Marl Karla P. Masa
1
;
Ferdiliza Dandah S. Garcia
1
Author Information
1. Department of Speech Pathology, College of Allied Medical Professions, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines
2. National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- From:
Philippine Journal of Health Research and Development
2024;28(2):20-33
- CountryPhilippines
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Background:The emerging practice of tele-AAC (telepractice in augmentative and alternative communication) is gaining attention. Mapping existing research is necessary to help guide clinicians, characterize knowledge gaps, and identify future research directions.
Objectives:This study aimed to describe tele-AAC studies' quantity, research characteristics (i.e., rationale, objectives, methodology), and investigated services (i.e., service type, provider, mode, etc.).
Methodology:The scoping review involved four phases (search, selection, extraction, synthesis) and covered published and
unpublished studies disseminated between 2002-2021. Information sources searched include 12 databases or repositories and six
conference websites. For selection and extraction, two independent reviewers reviewed each document and the team resolved
discrepancies by consensus. The extracted data were coded and synthesized quantitatively and narratively
Results:Thirty unique studies were included. The majority were published (n = 24; 80%), conducted in developed countries (n = 29;
97%), investigated service efficacy (n = 21; 70%) and/or stakeholders experiences (n = 18; 60%), used experimental designs (n = 19;
63%), and involved 2-3 AAC users (n = 10; 33%). The studies focused on training and/or coaching services (n = 19; 63%), high-tech
AAC (n = 20; 67%), developmental disabilities (n = 20; 67%), and services provided by speech-language pathologists (SLPs) (n = 15;
50%) or AAC researchers (n = 10; 33%). Most services were synchronous (n = 20; 67%) and home-based (n = 20; 67%).
Conclusion:Telepractice offers multiple, innovative ways to maximize AAC access and outcomes. Although preliminary data are
available, the investigated populations, settings, and service delivery modes can be more diverse. Future researchers are recommended
to use less bias-prone designs.
- Full text:2024070810152177068(4) CHUA 2024 - FINAL pp. 20-33.pdf
