Comparison of efficacies of surgeries via frontal keyhole approach assisted by endoscope and via temporal keyhole approach assisted by microscope in treatment of basal ganglia cerebral hemorrhage
10.3760/cma.j.cn115354-20210621-00390
- VernacularTitle:神经内镜下经额锁孔入路与显微镜下经颞锁孔入路手术治疗基底节区脑出血的疗效比较
- Author:
Yun LIAO
1
;
Minfeng SHENG
;
Zhongyong WANG
;
Tao WU
;
Qing ZHU
;
Jun DONG
Author Information
1. 苏州大学附属第二医院神经外科，苏州 215004
- Keywords:
Neuro-endoscopy;
Keyhole approach;
Basal ganglia hemorrhage;
Clinical efficacy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Neuromedicine
2021;20(11):1124-1129
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of surgeries via frontal keyhole approach assisted by neuro-endoscope and via temporal keyhole approach assisted by microscope in cerebral basal ganglia hemorrhage. Methods:One hundred and five patients with basal ganglia cerebral hemorrhage admitted to our hospital from January 2017 to January 2020 were chosen in our study; 51 patients underwent surgeries via frontal keyhole approach assisted by neuro-endoscope (neuro-endoscopy group) and 54 patients underwent surgeries via temporal keyhole approach assisted by microscope (microscopy group). The clinical data of these patients were retrospectively analyzed; and the differences of hematoma clearance rate, intraoperative blood loss, duration of surgery, length of hospital stays, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores one week after surgery, incidence of postoperative complications, and activity of daily living (ADL) scores 6 months after surgery were compared between the 2 groups. Results:There were no significant differences in hematoma clearance rate and length of hospital stays between the 2 groups ( P>0.05). As compared with the microscopy group, the neuro-endoscopy group had significantly lower intraoperative blood loss, significantly shorter duration of surgery, and statistically higher GCS scores one week after surgery ( P<0.05). There were no significant differences in incidence of postoperative complications and ADL scores 6 months after surgery between 2 groups ( P>0.05). Conclusion:Both surgeries via frontal keyhole approach assisted by neuro-endoscope and via temporal keyhole approach assisted by microscope can effectively clear the intracranial hematoma in patients with cerebral hemorrhage in the basal ganglia and protect neurological function; however, surgeries via frontal keyhole approach assisted by neuro-endoscope has advantages of shorter duration of surgery and lower intraoperative blood loss, and earlier neurological function recovery.
