Suture Omentopexy of Perforated Duodenal Ulcer: Laparoscopic vs. Open Surgery.
- Author:
Kwan Tae PARK
1
;
Sun Han KIM
;
Sang Woo LEE
;
Yoon Sik HONG
;
Cheong Woong WHANG
Author Information
1. Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Perforation;
Duodenal ulcer;
Laparoscopy;
Helicobacter pylori
- MeSH:
Amoxicillin;
Clarithromycin;
Duodenal Ulcer*;
Helicobacter pylori;
Humans;
Laparoscopy;
Length of Stay;
Mortality;
Omeprazole;
Operative Time;
Proton Pumps;
Recurrence;
Risk Factors;
Sutures*;
Ulcer;
Wound Infection
- From:Journal of the Korean Surgical Society
2000;59(3):355-363
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Perforated duodenal ulcer can be treated by variable methods ranging from non-operative management to immediate definitive acid-reduction surgery. With the current availability of potent H2 blocker, proton pump inhibitor, and effective Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication regimens, ulcer recurrence is usually low and the need for definitive surgery has been reduced. Furthermore, the introduction of laparoscopic closure makes the principles of conventional surgical approach weakened at present and surgeons are faced with the choice of definitive surgery or omental patch repair, open or laparoscopic surgery. The aims of this study were to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic omental patch repair in comparison with conventional surgery and to investigate the status of H. pylori infection and the role of eradication of H. pylori. In addition, we tried to introduce our unique surgical experience using a 3-port technique. METHODS: We treated 31 patients of perforated duodenal ulcer laparoscopically and compared with 30 patients operated by conventional omental patch repair. The patients treated by laparoscopy were evaluated for H. pylori status postoperatively. H. pylori infected patients received 1 or 2 weeks course of Omeprazole plus Amoxicillin and Clarithromycin. RESULTS: Laparoscopic repair was successful in 26 cases and the conversion rate was 16.1%. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of operative time and mortality. Morbidity was comparable between both groups, but the wound infection was more common in the open group. The clinical course and hospital stay were significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group. H. pylori infection rate was 47% and there were 2 cases of ulcer recurrence and 2 cases of reperforation in H. pylori negative patients. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic closure of perforated duodenal ulcer using a 3-port technique is a technically feasible and safe alternative to open repair, with early recovery and low morbidity. H. pylori is positive in about half of perforated duodenal ulcer patients and should be eradicated in positive patients. Other risk factors on ulcer perforation should be identified.
