Driving Safety after Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review.
10.4184/asj.2017.11.2.319
- Author:
Abduljabbar ALHAMMOUD
1
;
Kenan ALKHALILI
;
Jack HANNALLAH
;
Bashar IBECHE
;
Sohail BAJAMMAL
;
Abdul Moeen BACO
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar. aghammoud85@hotmail.com
- Publication Type:Review
- Keywords:
Reaction time;
Driving;
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion;
Fusion;
Spine
- MeSH:
Cognition;
Diskectomy;
Humans;
Pathology;
Reaction Time;
Spine
- From:Asian Spine Journal
2017;11(2):319-327
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
This study aimed to assess driving reaction times (DRTs) after spinal surgery to establish a timeframe for safe resumption of driving by the patient postoperatively. The MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases were analyzed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) Statement for clinical studies that investigated changes in DRTs following cervical and lumbar spinal surgery. Changes in DRTs and patients' clinical presentation, pathology, anatomical level affected, number of spinal levels involved, type of intervention, pain level, and driving skills were assessed. The literature search identified 12 studies that investigated postoperative DRTs. Six studies met the inclusion criteria; five studies assessed changes in DRT after lumbar spine surgery and two studies after cervical spina surgery. The spinal procedures were selective nerve root block, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, and lumbar fusion and/ordecompression. DRTs exhibited variable responses to spinal surgery and depended on the patients' clinical presentation, spinal level involved, and type of procedure performed. The evidence regarding the patients' ability to resume safe driving after spinal surgery is scarce. Normalization of DRT or a return of DRT to pre-spinal intervention level is a widely accepted indicator for safe driving, with variable levels of statistical significance owing to multiple confounding factors. Considerations of the type of spinal intervention, pain level, opioid consumption, and cognitive function should be factored in the assessment of a patient's ability to safely resume driving.
