A systematic review on the current attitudes and clinical practices on the use of cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes in pediatric anesthesia
- Author:
Lalaine O. Abainza
1
;
Jose Emil A. Ferrolino
1
;
Sheila B. Espina-Bertoso
1
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords: Endotracheal tubes; Pediatric
- MeSH: Anesthesiology
- From: Acta Medica Philippina 2024;58(9):22-29
- CountryPhilippines
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Background:For several decades now, the use of uncuffed endotracheal tube (ETT) is the gold standard in providing airway and ventilatory support to children under anesthesia. However, there has been a change in focus from the application of uncuffed ETT to cuffed ETT among children, and this matter has been debated for years. In fact, several studies have shown that even across and within countries, the attitudes and practices of anesthesiologists on the use of types of endotracheal tubes differed.
Objective:To describe the current attitudes and practices of anesthesiologists regarding the use of uncuffed or cuffed ETT for children.
Methods:A systematic review of observational studies on the current attitudes and practices of pediatric anesthesiologists regarding the use of cuffed and uncuffed ETT was conducted from May to November 2020. Cochrane reviews, Medline, Pubmed, and EMBASE were searched and yielded five relevant studies.
Results:The use of cuffed ETT ranged between 11%-61% in the included studies and all reported that there were no consensus or standard on whether cuffed or uncuffed ETT was better. Reported factors for cuffed ETT use included: 1) Personal choice, 2) Department protocol, 3) Availability of resources, and 4) Specific conditions such as obesity, planned or emergency procedure, and reduced lung compliance. In terms of ETT size, reported criteria were: 1) Use of a formula, 2) Use of abacus/calculator, and 3) In relation to the fifth finger's width.
Conclusions:The current systematic review demonstrated that there is wide variation in current attitudes and practices of anesthesiologists regarding the use of uncuffed or cuffed endotracheal tubes in children. Likewise, factors affecting choice of ETT and criteria for selection varied in the published literature. The results of this systematic review highlight the need for a standard guideline to help clinicians choose if cuffed or uncuffed ETT is better in certain scenarios and to help them decide in selecting the most appropriate ETT size. - Full text:20240613082229608438743-Article Text-158437-1-10-20240523.pdf
