Investigation on the current status of medication education in medical institutions in China
- VernacularTitle:我国医疗机构用药教育开展现状调查
- Author:
ZHANG YIZHOU
1
,
2
;
DU LIPING
1
,
2
;
ZHANG YUQING
1
,
2
;
LIU SITONG
1
,
2
;
MEI DAN
1
,
2
Author Information
1. Dept. of Pharmacy，Peking Union Medical College Hospital，Peking Union Medical College，Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences，Beijing 100730，China
2. School of Traditional Chinese Medicine，Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine，Tianjin 301617，China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
medical institutions;
medication education;
influencing factors;
compensation;
pharmaceutical care;
questionnaire
- From:
China Pharmacy
2024;35(11):1380-1385
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE To investigate the development and current status of medication education in domestic medical institutions， aiming to provide reference and suggestions for better development of medication education. METHODS The online questionnaire survey was conducted in March 2023 to investigate the implementation of medication education in medical institutions at all levels nationwide； descriptive analysis and influencing factors analysis were conducted. RESULTS A total of 1 368 questionnaires were recycled， 1 304 of which were effective questionnaires， with the effective rate of 95.32%. The average rate of providing medication education was 73.62% in medical institutions nationwide， 76.05%， 67.68% and 73.76% respectively in Eastern， Central and Western regions， 87.11%， 60.57% and 46.32% respectively in tertiary， secondary and primary medical institutions. The commonest place and way of carrying out medication education were dispensing window and oral instructions， and both were more diverse in tertiary medical institutions， compared with second and primary medical institutions. The median annual service volume of medication education in medical institutions PUMCH-A- at all levels was 500 people； the higher the level of medical institutions， the larger the annual service volume of medication education （P＝0.023）. More than half of medical institutions didn’t have any form of compensation for medication education， which was mostly reflected in the workload of medical institutions with compensation. Grade of medical institutions， degree of information and automation were the major influencing factors of carrying out medication education. CONCLUSIONS The ratio of carrying out medication education is improved in the central region in China in recent years， compared with 2019； while that of primary institutions in all regions is at a low level and should be improved. The place of carrying out medication education should be set according to the characteristics of medical institutions， and medication education forms should be enriched as much as possible. The quantity and quality of medication education talents still need to be improved. Compensation for pharmaceutical care should be continually explored and implemented to prompt high-quality and sustainable development of medication education.
