The clinical efficacy of Da Vinci robot versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of posterior mediastinal tumors: A retrospective cohort study
- VernacularTitle:达芬奇机器人与胸腔镜外科治疗后纵隔肿物临床疗效比较的回顾性队列研究
- Author:
Feng WANG
1
;
Yuhang YUAN
1
;
Chenhan WANG
1
;
Wenteng HU
1
;
Li HE
1
;
Wenwen YANG
1
;
Shuo SUN
1
;
Min ZHANG
1
;
Biao HAN
2
Author Information
1. 1. The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, P. R. China 2. Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, P. R. China
2. Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, P. R. China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Posterior mediastinal tumor;
robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery;
lateral thoracic approach;
video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery
- From:
Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
2024;31(05):695-701
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the short-term clinical effects of Da Vinci robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in the treatment of posterior mediastinal tumors, and to explore the advantages of RATS posterior mediastinal tumor resection. Methods The clinical data of patients who underwent posterior mediastinal tumors resection through the lateral chest approach admitted to the same medical group in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of the First Hospital of Lanzhou University between January 2019 to January 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different surgical methods, the patients were divided into a RATS group and a VATS group. The clinical data were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 85 patients were included in this study. There were 39 patients in the RATS group, including 25 females and 14 males, with an average age of 47.6±13.0 years, and 46 patients in the VATS group, including 14 males and 32 females, with an average age of 45.3±14.7 years. All patients completed the operation successfully. The hospitalization cost in the RATS group was significantly higher than that in the VATS group (P<0.001), and the white blood cell count and neutrophilic granulocyte percentage on the first day after operation in the RATS group were lower than those in the VATS group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The operative time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative hospital stay, white blood cell count and neutrophil percentage on the third postoperative day, visual analogue scale score on the first and third postoperative days, duration of analgesic pump use, postoperative 12 h oxygen saturation (no oxygen inhalation), postoperative down bed time, total thoracic drainage volume, duration of drainage tube retention, and postoperative complication rates were not statistically different between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no perioperative death, conversion to thoracotomy or serious perioperative complications in both groups. Conclusion RATS resection of posterior mediastinal tumor via lateral thoracic approach is safe and feasible, and its short-term effect is similar to that of VATS via lateral thoracic single-hole approach. It is worth further comparative study to explore its benefit and cost performance.
