Acupuncture with Manipulation for Lumbar Disc Herniation in Remission of 50 Cases:A Randomized Controlled Trial
10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2024.10.009
- VernacularTitle:针刺联合点扳抖手法治疗腰椎间盘突出症缓解期50例随机对照试验
- Author:
Chun CHEN
1
;
Jiao JIN
1
;
Jingxuan MO
1
;
Hai LIN
1
;
Fudong SHI
1
;
Guojun WANG
1
;
Guannan WU
1
;
Shimin ZHANG
1
Author Information
1. Wangjing Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100102
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
lumbar disc herniation;
remission period;
acupuncture;
massage;
randomized controlled trial
- From:
Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
2024;65(10):1026-1032
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of acupuncture with manipulation for lumbar disc herniation in remission period. MethodsOne hundred and four patients with lumbar disc herniation in remission were randomly divided into a treatment group and a control group, with 52 cases in each group. Treatment group applied acupuncture with manipulation of pointing, pulling, and shaking. Acupoints were selected as lumbar Jiaji (EX-B2, bilateral), Ashi point, Shenshu (BL 23, bilateral), Huantiao (GB 30, bilateral), Weizhong (BL 40, opposite side of the affected area), Chengshan (BL 57, opposite side of the affected area). The control group applied lumbar traction plus acupoint ultrasonic pulse penetration therapy (acupoints selection same as the treatment group); 20 minutes each time, 3 times a week, a total of 3 weeks for both groups. The primary outcome was the improvement rate of lumbar disc herniation symptoms and signs, which was calculated at 1 week of treatment, 3 weeks of treatment, 1 month follow-up, and 3 months follow-up, respectively; the secondary outcome were the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores (including ODI total scores, sitting scores and standing scores), which were evaluated before treatment, 1 week of treatment, 3 weeks of treatment, 1 month follow-up, and 3 months follow-up; clinical effectiveness was assessed at 3 months follow-up; and the occurrence of adverse events in the participants, as well as blood routine, urine routine, stool routine, and electrocardiograms before and after the treatment were recorded to evaluate safety. ResultsTwo patients from each group fell out, and 50 patients of each group were included in the outcome analysis ultimately. The scores of lumbar disc herniation symptoms and signs improved more in the treatment group than in the control group at 1 week of treatment, 3 weeks of treatment, 1 month follow-up and 3 months follow-up (P<0.01). The JOA scores of participants in both groups at 1 week of treatment, 3 weeks of treatment, 1 month follow-up and 3 months follow-up were higher than those before treatment in the same group, and the VAS scores, ODI total scores, ODI sitting scores and standing scores were significantly lower than those before treatment in the same group (P<0.05), and the JOA scores of patients in the treatment group were higher than those of the control group at all time points, and the VAS scores, ODI total scores, ODI sitting scores and standing score were lower than those of the control group (P<0.05). At the 3 months follow-up, the excellent rate of the treatment group was 70.00% (35/50) better than that of the control group, which was 50.00% (25/50) (P<0.05). There were no abnormalities in blood, urine, stool routines and electrocardiograms before and after treatment in both groups, and no adverse events occurred. ConclusionAcupuncture with manipulation of pointing, pulling, and shaking for treating patients with lumbar disc herniation in remission has a better safety on pain relief and improving quality of life, and the effectiveness is better than lumbar traction plus acupoint ultrasonic pulse penetration therapy.