Effect of ground cage use on Oncomelania hupensis spread
10.16250/j.32.1374.2023219
- VernacularTitle:地笼使用对钉螺扩散的影响
- Author:
Mengting ZHONG
1
;
Xianquan LU
1
;
Sihai FANG
2
;
Xuefeng JIANG
1
;
Weiling GU
3
;
Zelin XIANG
3
Author Information
1. Pinghu Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jiaxing, Zhejiang 314200, China
2. Xindai Township Central Healthcare Center, Pinghu City, Zhejiang Province, China
3. Jiaxing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jiaxing, Zhejiang 314050, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Oncomelania hupensis;
Ground cage;
Spread;
Snail density
- From:
Chinese Journal of Schistosomiasis Control
2024;36(2):198-200
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To examine the effect of ground cage use on Oncomelania hupensis spread, so as to provide insights into precision snail control. Methods Twenty ground cages that were frequently used to capture rice field eels were purchased, including 11 packaging tape-made cages, 7 plastic cages and 2 nylon rope-made cages. The eel-capturing activity was mimicked, and 20 ground cages were assigned in settings with relatively high (1.00 snail/0.1 m2 and higher) and low snail densities (< 1.00 snail/0.1 m2) in Xindai Township, Pinghu City, Zhejiang Province during the period from 15 : 00 to 8 : 00 of the following day on April 13, 26 and 28. The numbers of snails carried by different types of ground cages were compared in settings with different types of snail densities using the rank-sum test. Results A total of 11 cage-times were assigned in settings with a high snail density, and a total of 77 snails were captured, with a mean number of 7 snails in each cage-time and 2.15 snails in 0.1 m2 ground cage. The mean numbers of snails carried by packaging tape-made and plastic cages were 2.47 snails/0.1 m2 cage and 0.37 snails/0.1 m2 cage, respectively. A total of 24 cage-times were assigned in settings with a low snail density, and a total of 8 snails were captured, with a mean number of 0.33 snails in each cage-time and 0.09 snails in 0.1 m2 ground cage. The mean numbers of snails carried by packaging tape-made cages were 0.12 snails/0.1 m2 cage; however, no snails were carried by plastic or nylon rope-made cages. The number of snails carried by ground cages was higher in settings with a high snail density than in settings with a low snail density (Z = −4.019, P < 0.01), and the number of snails carried by packaging tape-made cages was higher in settings with a high snail density than in settings with a low snail density (Z = −4.086, P < 0.01). No significant differences were found in the numbers of snails carried by different types of ground cages. Conclusion The use of ground cage in snail habitats is a contributor to snail spread.
