Construction of the evaluation index system for core competence of hospital specialist service operation assistants
10.3760/cma.j.cn111325-20230511-00382
- VernacularTitle:医院专科运营助理核心能力评价指标体系的构建
- Author:
Min WANG
1
;
Xiao ZHANG
;
Dawei QIN
;
Meirong LYU
;
Cong SHI
;
Xingyan MEI
;
Tiantian WU
;
Wenyuan MA
Author Information
1. 临沂市人民医院运营管理部，临沂 276000
- Keywords:
Personnel administration, hospital;
Specialist service operation assistant;
Core competence;
Evaluation;
Index system;
Donabedian model
- From:
Chinese Journal of Hospital Administration
2023;39(9):692-697
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To construct an evaluation index system for the core competence of hospital specialist service operation assistants and provide reference for the evaluation of such competence.Methods:From January to March 2022, literature analysis and behavioral event interviews were used to initially establish a core competence evaluation index system of hospital specialist service operation assistants, based on the Donabedian model. Subsequently, the Delphi expert consultation method was applied to conduct correspondence consultation, inviting experts to evaluate the contents and importance of the index system, using analytic hierarchy process to determine the weights of the indexes at all levels.Results:Two rounds of expert consultation were carried out, and the valid recovery rate of the questionnaire was 100%. The familiarity coefficient of the second round of correspondence was 0.87, the basis of judgment coefficient was 0.90, and the authority coefficient was 0.89. The final evaluation index system for core competence of hospital specialist service operation assistant consisted of 3 first-level indexes, 13 second-level indexes and 81 third-level indexes. The weight of the first-level index structure index was 0.266, and the highest weight among the second-level indexes was the operational development ability (0.083), while the highest weight among the third-level indexes of operational development ability was the comprehensive coordination ability (0.193); The weight of the first-level index process index was 0.405, and the corresponding second-level and third-level indexes with the highest weight were department operation practice work (0.157) and reasonable resource allocation (0.303), respectively; The weight of the first-level index result index was 0.329, and the corresponding second-level and third-level indexes with the highest weight were the weight of medical quality and safety (0.103) and drug adverse reaction reporting rate (0.237), respectively.Conclusions:The evaluation index system constructed in this study proves scientific and reasonable in weight assignment, proving a reference for the management of the specialist service operation assistants.
