Construction of an evaluation index system for clinical research innovation in medical institutions
10.3760/cma.j.cn111325-20230511-00387
- VernacularTitle:医疗机构临床研究创新评价指标体系的构建
- Author:
Ying QIAN
1
;
Biyun QIAN
;
Wenwen LYU
;
Weituo ZHANG
;
Jun LI
;
Ziyi SHENG
;
Yanbin MA
;
Xingpeng WANG
Author Information
1. 上海申康医院发展中心，上海 200050
- Keywords:
Clinical research;
Innovation;
Evaluation index system;
Delphi method;
Analytic hierarchy process method
- From:
Chinese Journal of Hospital Administration
2023;39(8):584-587
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To constructe an evaluation index system for clinical research innovation in medical institutions, for references for enhancing the research and innovation capabilities of medical institutions and formulating policies related to clinical research innovation.Methods:From March 2022 to May 2023, relevant literature and policies on the evaluation system of scientific and technological innovation at home and abroad were analyzed to establish the preliminary screening clinical research innovation indicators. Two rounds of Delphi method were used to construct a clinical research innovation index evaluation system, analytic hierarchy process was used to calculate the weights of each indicator.Results:The effective response rates of the two rounds of consultation questionnaires were both 100.00%, with expert authority coefficients of 0.95 and Kendall coordination coefficients of 0.85 and 0.87, respectively. The clinical research innovation index evaluation system ultimately established 4 primary indicators, 13 secondary indicators, and 42 tertiary indicators. The first level indicators included infrastructure construction, innovation support environment, clinical research activity, and innovation effectiveness, with weight coefficients of 18.00%, 21.00%, 30.00%, and 31.00%, respectively.Conclusions:The clinical research innovation evaluation index system constructed in this study covered the investment, environment, and output aspects of research innovation, and could comprehensively and objectively reflect the clinical research innovation ability of medical institutions.
