Effect of 1 064 nm picosecond laser combined with intense pulsed light in treatment of melisma
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0290.2024.01.005
- VernacularTitle:1 064 nm PicoWay超皮秒激光联合强脉冲光治疗黄褐斑的效果
- Author:
Ming ZHOU
1
;
Qiaona GUO
;
Chengbo LIU
;
Yanting WANG
Author Information
1. 西安国际医学中心医院医学美容中心，西安 710100
- Keywords:
Lasers;
Intense pulsed light;
Melasma;
Combination therapy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Aesthetics and Cosmetology
2024;30(1):24-28
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of a 1 064 nm picosecond laser combined with intense pulsed light in the treatment of melasma.Methods:From May to August 2022, ninety-two female patients with melasma were admitted to the Medical Cosmetology Center, Xi′an International Medical Center Hospital, aged 25-50 years, with an average age of (35.0±3.5) years. The were divided by random number table method. Forty-six cases were divided into laser combined group, which were treated with precise intense pulsed light combined with a 1 064 nm picosecond laser. Forty-six cases in the laser group were treated with a 1 064 nm picosecond laser. The area and severity score of melasma (MASI), VISIA score and clinical efficacy were evaluated.Results:The MASI scores of laser combined group were 12.58 (11.04, 13.99) before treatment, and the MASI scores of laser group were 13.16 (11.47, 14.14) before treatment. The MASI scores of laser combined group were 5.75 (3.79, 7.19), and the MASI scores of laser group were 7.15 (5.42, 5.85) after treatment. The MASI scores of the two groups were decreased compared with those before treatment, and the MASI score of the laser combined group was lower than that of the laser group. The difference was statistically significant ( Z=-4.05, P<0.01). The median VISIA scores of the laser combined group were (173.72±43.77), and the median VISIA scores of the laser group were (175.65±34.9) before treatment. The median VISIA scores of the laser combined group were (135.46±41.63), and the median VISIA scores ofthe laser group were (145.26±33.33) after treatment. The VISIA scores of the two groups were decreased compared with those before treatment. The scores of the laser combined group were lower than those of the laser group. The difference was statistically significant ( t=-2.52, P<0.05). The effective rate of the laser combined group (80.43%, 37/46) was higher than that of the laser group (69.56%, 22/46, P<0.05). Conclusions:The curative effect of 1 064 nm picosecond laser combined with precise intense pulsed light in the treatment of melasma is better than that of a 1 064 nm picosecond laser alone.
